Impact of Nicotine Replacement Therapy Sampling on Cessation-Related Processes.

Objectives: Smoking prevalence remains high among low-income smokers. Understanding processes (eg, withdrawal, craving, motivation) in early smoking cessation is crucially important for designing effective interventions for this population. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a novel, in-sessio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Addiction Medicine Vol. 18; no. 4; pp. 397 - 404
Autores principales: Sisson, Michelle L., Gajos, Jamie M., Wolford-Clevenger, Caitlin, Chichester, Keith R., Hawes, Elizabeth S., Hill, Samantha V., Shelton, Richard C., Hendricks, Peter S., Businelle, Michael S., Carpenter, Matthew J., Cropsey, Karen L.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Jul/Aug2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=179264606&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 179264606
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        19320620
        3BL0
      jtl: Journal of Addiction Medicine
      issn: 19320620
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul/Aug2024
      vid: 18
      iid: 4
      pid: 433
      pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      place: Baltimore, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        179264606
        179264606
        179264606
        10.1097/ADM.0000000000001298
        179264606
      ppf: 397
      ppct: 7
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Impact of Nicotine Replacement Therapy Sampling on Cessation-Related Processes.
      aug:
        au:
          Sisson, Michelle L.
          Gajos, Jamie M.
          Wolford-Clevenger, Caitlin
          Chichester, Keith R.
          Hawes, Elizabeth S.
          Hill, Samantha V.
          Shelton, Richard C.
          Hendricks, Peter S.
          Businelle, Michael S.
          Carpenter, Matthew J.
          Cropsey, Karen L.
        affil: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
      sug:
        subj:
          Nicotine Replacement Therapy
          Smoking Cessation
          Smoking Therapy
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Secondary Analysis
          In Vivo Studies
          Poverty
          Diaries
          Substance Withdrawal Syndrome
          Craving
          Motivation
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          T-Tests
          Paired T-Tests
          Chi Square Test
          Descriptive Statistics
          Funding Source
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Objectives: Smoking prevalence remains high among low-income smokers. Understanding processes (eg, withdrawal, craving, motivation) in early smoking cessation is crucially important for designing effective interventions for this population. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a novel, in-session sampling intervention (ie, In Vivo) as compared with standard care behavioral smoking cessation counseling (SC) among community-dwelling low-income smokers (n = 83). This analysis examined the effect of 5 in-session sampling interventions on cessation-related processes and perceived advantages or disadvantages of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) products over time using daily diaries. Results: The In Vivo treatment had an early positive impact in terms of decreasing withdrawal symptoms and cravings, and increasing perceived advantages to NRT, with moderate to large effect sizes. Results also showed that the treatment effectively reduced withdrawal symptoms and cravings in-session, with small-to-medium and medium-to-large effect sizes, respectively. In-session reduction of withdrawal symptoms and cravings did not occur for the SC group, with the exception of decreased withdrawal symptoms occurring during week 4. The In Vivo treatment did not impact quit goal, desire to quit, abstinence self-efficacy, perceived difficulty in quitting, motivational engagement, or perceived disadvantages to NRT. The In Vivo group reported less daily cigarette use relative to the SC group, in addition to reporting less cigarette use on days they reported greater combination NRT use. Conclusions: There is preliminary support for this In Vivo treatment over SC in reducing withdrawal, craving, and the number of cigarettes smoked per day, as well as promoting perceived advantages of NRT among low-income smokers.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N