Distributional analyses reveal the polymorphic nature of the Stroop interference effect: It's about (response) time.

The study addressed the still-open issue of whether semantic (in addition to response) conflict does indeed contribute to Stroop interference (which along with facilitation contributes to the overall Stroop effect also known as Congruency effect). To this end, semantic conflict was examined across t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Memory & Cognition Vol. 52; no. 6; pp. 1229 - 1246
Autores principales: Martinon, Léa M., Ferrand, Ludovic, Burca, Mariana, Hasshim, Nabil, Lakhzoum, Dounia, Parris, Benjamin A., Silvert, Laetitia, Augustinova, Maria
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=179325712&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 179325712
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0090502X
        MEG
      jtl: Memory & Cognition
      issn: 0090502X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2024
      vid: 52
      iid: 6
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        179325712
        10.3758/s13421-024-01538-3
      ppf: 1229
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.4MB
      tig:
        atl: Distributional analyses reveal the polymorphic nature of the Stroop interference effect: It's about (response) time.
      aug:
        au:
          Martinon, Léa M.
          Ferrand, Ludovic
          Burca, Mariana
          Hasshim, Nabil
          Lakhzoum, Dounia
          Parris, Benjamin A.
          Silvert, Laetitia
          Augustinova, Maria
        affil:
          https://ror.org/01k40cz91 Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, CRFDP, Rouen, France
          https://ror.org/01a8ajp46 LAPSCO, Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Clermont-Ferrand, France
          Université de Rouen Normandie, Le Centre de Recherches sur les Fonctionnements et Dysfonctionnements Psychologiques (CRFDP, EA 7475) and Université Clermont Auvergne, Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive (LAPSCO, CNRS UMR 6024), UFR PSSSE - 34 avenue Carnot - TSA 60401, 63001, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex, France
          https://ror.org/01tmqtf75 Department of Psychology, University of Salford, Salford, UK
          https://ror.org/05wwcw481 Department of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK
          Université de Rouen Normandie, Le Centre de Recherches sur les Fonctionnements et Dysfonctionnements Psychologiques (CRFDP, EA 7475), UFR SHS – Bâtiment Freinet, Place Emile Blondel, 76821, Mont Saint Aignan Cedex, France
      su:
        Research funding
        Descriptive statistics
        Neuropsychological tests
        Data analysis software
        Confidence intervals
      sug:
        subj:
          Research funding
          Descriptive statistics
          Neuropsychological tests
          Data analysis software
          Confidence intervals
      keyword:
        Distributional analyses
        Response conflict
        Response speed
        Semantic conflict
        Stroop effect
        Distributional analyses
        Response conflict
        Response speed
        Semantic conflict
        Stroop effect
      ab: The study addressed the still-open issue of whether semantic (in addition to response) conflict does indeed contribute to Stroop interference (which along with facilitation contributes to the overall Stroop effect also known as Congruency effect). To this end, semantic conflict was examined across the entire response time (RT) distribution (as opposed to mean RTs). Three (out of four) reported experiments, along with cross-experimental analyses, revealed that semantic conflict was absent in the participants' faster responses. This result characterizes Stroop interference as a unitary phenomenon (i.e., driven uniquely by response conflict). When the same participants' responses were slower, Stroop interference became a composite phenomenon with an additional contribution of semantic conflict that was statistically independent of both response conflict and facilitation. While the present findings allow us to account for the fact that semantic conflict has not been consistently found in past studies, further empirical and theoretical efforts are still needed to explain why exactly it is restricted to longer responses. Indeed, since neither unitary nor composite models can account for this polymorphic nature of Stroop interference on their own, the implications for the current state of theory are outlined.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N