Discrimination as a Public Wrong.

The enforcement mechanisms of anti-discrimination law manifest a puzzle: while the dominant view is that discrimination is a wrongdoing against individuals, which suggests that discriminatees should have the power to vindicate their rights, legal provisions sometimes authorise public officials to fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 44; no. 3; pp. 509 - 535
Autor principal: Goldiner, Adi
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Autumn2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=179421749&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 179421749
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01436503
        BJ4
      jtl: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
      issn: 01436503
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Autumn2024
      vid: 44
      iid: 3
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        179421749
        10.1093/ojls/gqae011
      ppf: 509
      ppct: 26
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 473KB
      tig:
        atl: Discrimination as a Public Wrong.
      aug:
        au: Goldiner, Adi
        affil: Hebrew University of Jerusalem
      su:
        Discrimination (Sociology)
        Anti-discrimination laws
        Criminal law
        Jurisprudence
        Government policy
      sug:
        subj:
          Discrimination (Sociology)
          Anti-discrimination laws
          Criminal law
          Jurisprudence
          Government policy
      keyword:
        discrimination
        equality commissions
        public wrong
        special jurisprudence
      ab: The enforcement mechanisms of anti-discrimination law manifest a puzzle: while the dominant view is that discrimination is a wrongdoing against individuals, which suggests that discriminatees should have the power to vindicate their rights, legal provisions sometimes authorise public officials to file claims against alleged discriminators, regardless of discriminatees' preferences. Seeking to make sense of this puzzle, this article draws on theories of state enforcement under criminal law to explore the justification of public enforcement under anti-discrimination law and reflect on the nature of discrimination more broadly. It claims that an instrumental justification of public enforcement of anti-discrimination law is left wanting. Instead, it argues that public enforcement in this domain is warranted because discrimination is not only a private wrong against individuals, but is also a public wrong, namely a wrong against the community as a whole.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: © 2019 Oxford University Press.
      item: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
      holder: Oxford University Press / USA
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N