'Hard AI Crime': The Deterrence Turn.
Machines powered by artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly taking over tasks previously performed by humans alone. In accomplishing such tasks, they may intentionally commit 'AI crimes', ie engage in behaviour which would be considered a crime if it were accomplished by humans. For instance,...
| Publicado en: | Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 44; no. 3; pp. 673 - 702 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Autumn2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=179421756&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 179421756 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01436503 BJ4 jtl: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies issn: 01436503 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Autumn2024 vid: 44 iid: 3 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 179421756 10.1093/ojls/gqae018 ppf: 673 ppct: 29 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 588KB tig: atl: 'Hard AI Crime': The Deterrence Turn. aug: au: Nerantzi, Elina Sartor, Giovanni affil: Law Department, European University Institute Department of Legal Studies, University of Bologna su: Artificial intelligence Criminal law Machinery Law & economics Criminal liability sug: subj: Artificial intelligence Criminal law Machinery Law & economics Criminal liability keyword: artificial intelligence criminal law deterrence law and economics legal theory responsibility ab: Machines powered by artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly taking over tasks previously performed by humans alone. In accomplishing such tasks, they may intentionally commit 'AI crimes', ie engage in behaviour which would be considered a crime if it were accomplished by humans. For instance, an advanced AI trading agent may—despite its designer's best efforts—autonomously manipulate markets while lacking the properties for being held criminally responsible. In such cases (hard AI crimes) a criminal responsibility gap emerges since no agent (human or artificial) can be legitimately punished for this outcome. We aim to shift the 'hard AI crime' discussion from blame to deterrence and design an 'AI deterrence paradigm', separate from criminal law and inspired by the economic theory of crime. The homo economicus has come to life as a machina economica , which, even if cannot be meaningfully blamed, can nevertheless be effectively deterred since it internalises criminal sanctions as costs. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: © 2019 Oxford University Press. item: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies holder: Oxford University Press / USA dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|