Identification and Localization of Indolent and Aggressive Prostate Cancers Using Multilevel Bi-LSTM.

Identifying indolent and aggressive prostate cancers is a critical problem for optimal treatment. The existing approaches of prostate cancer detection are facing challenges as the techniques rely on ground truth labels with limited accuracy, and histological similarity, and do not consider the disea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Digital Imaging Vol. 37; no. 4; pp. 1591 - 1609
Autor principal: Alhassan, Afnan M.
Formato: diagnostic images equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=179554125&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 179554125
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08971889
        DOQ
      jtl: Journal of Digital Imaging
      issn: 08971889
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2024
      vid: 37
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        179554125
        179554125
        179554125
        10.1007/s10278-024-01030-z
        179554125
      ppf: 1591
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Identification and Localization of Indolent and Aggressive Prostate Cancers Using Multilevel Bi-LSTM.
      aug:
        au: Alhassan, Afnan M.
        affil: https://ror.org/05hawb687 College of Computing and Information Technology, Shaqra University, 11961, Shaqra, Saudi Arabia
      sug:
        subj:
          Prostatic Neoplasms Diagnosis
          Prostatic Neoplasms Pathology
          Neoplasm Invasiveness
          Long Short-Term Memory
          Human
          Image Interpretation, Computer Assisted Methods
          Male
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Descriptive Statistics
          Prostate Pathology
          Male
      ab: Identifying indolent and aggressive prostate cancers is a critical problem for optimal treatment. The existing approaches of prostate cancer detection are facing challenges as the techniques rely on ground truth labels with limited accuracy, and histological similarity, and do not consider the disease pathology characteristics, and indefinite differences in appearance between the cancerous and healthy tissue lead to many false positive and false negative interpretations. Hence, this research introduces a comprehensive framework designed to achieve accurate identification and localization of prostate cancers, irrespective of their aggressiveness. This is accomplished through the utilization of a sophisticated multilevel bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) model. The pre-processed images are subjected to multilevel feature map-based U-Net segmentation, bolstered by ResNet-101 and a channel-based attention module that improves the performance. Subsequently, segmented images undergo feature extraction, encompassing various feature types, including statistical features, a global hybrid-based feature map, and a ResNet-101 feature map that enhances the detection accuracy. The extracted features are fed to the multilevel Bi-LSTM model, further optimized through channel and spatial attention mechanisms that offer the effective localization and recognition of complex structures of cancer. Further, the framework represents a promising approach for enhancing the diagnosis and localization of prostate cancers, encompassing both indolent and aggressive cases. Rigorous testing on a distinct dataset demonstrates the model's effectiveness, with performance evaluated through key metrics which are reported as 96.72%, 96.17%, and 96.17% for accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity respectively utilizing the dataset 1. For dataset 2, the model achieves the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values of 94.41%, 93.10%, and 94.96% respectively. These results surpass the efficiency of alternative methods.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        equations & formulas
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N