Comparing Strain Assessment in Compressed Sensing and Conventional Cine MRI.

The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of compressed sensing (CS) acceleration methods compared to conventional segmented cine (Seg) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for evaluating left ventricular (LV) function and strain by feature tracking (FT). In this prospective study, 45 healthy v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Digital Imaging Vol. 37; no. 4; pp. 1933 - 1944
Autores principales: Yao, Kaixuan, Deng, Wei, He, Rong, Gao, Hui, Wang, Linlin, Zhao, Ren, Yue, Xiuzheng, Yu, Yongqiang, Zhong, Liang, Li, Xiaohu
Formato: diagnostic images research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=179554131&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 179554131
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08971889
        DOQ
      jtl: Journal of Digital Imaging
      issn: 08971889
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2024
      vid: 37
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        179554131
        179554131
        179554131
        10.1007/s10278-024-01040-x
        179554131
      ppf: 1933
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Comparing Strain Assessment in Compressed Sensing and Conventional Cine MRI.
      aug:
        au:
          Yao, Kaixuan
          Deng, Wei
          He, Rong
          Gao, Hui
          Wang, Linlin
          Zhao, Ren
          Yue, Xiuzheng
          Yu, Yongqiang
          Zhong, Liang
          Li, Xiaohu
        affil: https://ror.org/03t1yn780 Research Center of Clinical Medical Imaging
      sug:
        subj:
          Ventricular Function, Left Evaluation
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods
          Image Interpretation, Computer Assisted
          Human
          Prospective Studies
          Image Enhancement
          Heart Ventricle, Left Physiopathology
          Ventricular Dysfunction, Left Diagnosis
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Funding Source
      ab: The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of compressed sensing (CS) acceleration methods compared to conventional segmented cine (Seg) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for evaluating left ventricular (LV) function and strain by feature tracking (FT). In this prospective study, 45 healthy volunteers underwent CMR imaging used Seg, threefold (CS3), fourfold (CS4), and eightfold (CS8) CS acceleration. Cine images were scored for quality (1–5 scale). LV volumetric and functional parameters and global longitudinal (GLS), circumferential (GCS), and radial strains (GRS) were quantified. LV volumetric and functional parameters exhibited no differences between Seg and all CS cines (all P > 0.05). The strains were similar for Seg, CS3, and CS4 (all P > 0.05). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in GRS and GCS between Seg and CS8 (all P > 0.05), but the global longitudinal strain was significantly lower for CS8 versus Seg (P < 0.001). Image quality declined with CS acceleration, especially in long-axis views with CS8. CS cine MRI at acceleration factor 4 maintained good image quality and accurate measurements of LV function and strain, although there was a slight reduction in the quality of long-axis images and GLS with CS8. CS acceleration up to a factor of 4 enabled fast CMR evaluations, making it suitable for clinical use.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N