Characterization of renal masses with MRI-based radiomics: assessment of inter-package and inter-observer reproducibility in a prospective pilot study.

Objectives: To evaluate radiomics features' reproducibility using inter-package/inter-observer measurement analysis in renal masses (RMs) based on MRI and to employ machine learning (ML) models for RM characterization. Methods: 32 Patients (23M/9F; age 61.8 ± 10.6 years) with RMs (25 renal cell carc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Abdominal Radiology Vol. 49; no. 10; pp. 3464 - 3476
Autores principales: Al-Mubarak, Haitham, Bane, Octavia, Gillingham, Nicolas, Kyriakakos, Christopher, Abboud, Ghadi, Cuevas, Jordan, Gonzalez, Janette, Meilika, Kirolos, Horowitz, Amir, Huang, Hsin-Hui, Daza, Jorge, Fauveau, Valentin, Badani, Ketan, Viswanath, Satish E., Taouli, Bachir, Lewis, Sara
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Oct2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Objectives: To evaluate radiomics features' reproducibility using inter-package/inter-observer measurement analysis in renal masses (RMs) based on MRI and to employ machine learning (ML) models for RM characterization. Methods: 32 Patients (23M/9F; age 61.8 ± 10.6 years) with RMs (25 renal cell carcinomas (RCC)/7 benign masses; mean size, 3.43 ± 1.73 cm) undergoing resection were prospectively recruited. All patients underwent 1.5 T MRI with T2-weighted (T2-WI), diffusion-weighted (DWI)/apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and pre-/post-contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1-WI). RMs were manually segmented using volume of interest (VOI) on T2-WI, DWI/ADC, and T1-WI pre-/post-contrast imaging (1-min, 3-min post-injection) by two independent observers using two radiomics software packages for inter-package and inter-observer assessments of shape/histogram/texture features common to both packages (104 features; n = 26 patients). Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess inter-observer and inter-package reproducibility of radiomics measurements [good (ICC ≥ 0.8)/moderate (ICC = 0.5–0.8)/poor (ICC < 0.5)]. ML models were employed using reproducible features (between observers and packages, ICC > 0.8) to distinguish RCC from benign RM. Results: Inter-package comparisons demonstrated that radiomics features from T1-WI-post-contrast had the highest proportion of good/moderate ICCs (54.8–58.6% for T1-WI-1 min), while most features extracted from T2-WI, T1-WI-pre-contrast, and ADC exhibited poor ICCs. Inter-observer comparisons found that radiomics measurements from T1-WI pre/post-contrast and T2-WI had the greatest proportion of features with good/moderate ICCs (95.3–99.1% T1-WI-post-contrast 1-min), while ADC measurements yielded mostly poor ICCs. ML models generated an AUC of 0.71 [95% confidence interval = 0.67–0.75] for diagnosis of RCC vs. benign RM. Conclusion: Radiomics features extracted from T1-WI-post-contrast demonstrated greater inter-package and inter-observer reproducibility compared to ADC, with fair accuracy for distinguishing RCC from benign RM. Clinical relevance: Knowledge of reproducibility of MRI radiomics features obtained on renal masses will aid in future study design and may enhance the diagnostic utility of radiomics models for renal mass characterization.