Notational Variants and Cognition: The Case of Dependency Grammar.
In recent years, dependency grammars have established themselves as valuable tools in theoretical and computational linguistics. To many linguists, dependency grammars and the more standard constituency-based formalisms are notational variants. We argue that, beyond considerations of formal equivale...
| Publicado en: | Erkenntnis Vol. 89; no. 7; pp. 2867 - 2898 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Oct2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=179636419&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 179636419 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01650106 5KZ jtl: Erkenntnis issn: 01650106 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2024 vid: 89 iid: 7 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 179636419 10.1007/s10670-022-00657-0 ppf: 2867 ppct: 31 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 606KB tig: atl: Notational Variants and Cognition: The Case of Dependency Grammar. aug: au: Nefdt, Ryan M. Baggio, Giosué affil: https://ror.org/03p74gp79 Department of Philosophy, University of the Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa https://ror.org/05xg72x27 Department of Language and Literature, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway su: Computational linguistics Psycholinguistics Neurolinguistics Grammar Linguists sug: subj: Computational linguistics Psycholinguistics Neurolinguistics Grammar Linguists ab: In recent years, dependency grammars have established themselves as valuable tools in theoretical and computational linguistics. To many linguists, dependency grammars and the more standard constituency-based formalisms are notational variants. We argue that, beyond considerations of formal equivalence, cognition may also serve as a background for a genuine comparison between these different views of syntax. In this paper, we review and evaluate some of the most common arguments and evidence employed to advocate for the cognitive or neural reality of dependency grammars in linguistics, psycholinguistics, or neurolinguistics. We then raise the possibility that the abilities to represent and track, alternatively or in parallel, constituency and dependency structures co-exist in human cognition and are constitutive of syntactic competence. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Erkenntnis is a copyright of Springer, 2024. All Rights Reserved. item: Erkenntnis holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|