Jewish History Must Be Defended.
This essay stages an encounter between Michel Foucault and Franz Rosenzweig by juxtaposing their parallel observations on the continuity between history and war. While Foucault analyzes the strategies organizing seventeenth-century historical writing about the Norman conquest of England and the Fran...
| Publicado en: | Jewish Quarterly Review Vol. 114; no. 3; pp. 405 - 438 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
University of Pennsylvania Press
Summer2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=179647554&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 179647554 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00216682 2HA jtl: Jewish Quarterly Review issn: 00216682 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Summer2024 vid: 114 iid: 3 pid: 4636 pub: University of Pennsylvania Press artinfo: ui: 179647554 10.1353/jqr.2024.a936355 ppf: 405 ppct: 33 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 612KB tig: atl: Jewish History Must Be Defended. aug: au: Stern, Adam Y. su: Jewish history Foucault, Michel, 1926-1984 Rosenzweig, Franz, 1886-1929 Historicism Antisemitism Zionism sug: subj: Jewish history Foucault, Michel, 1926-1984 Rosenzweig, Franz, 1886-1929 Historicism Antisemitism Zionism keyword: antisemitism Canaanites Franz Rosenzweig historicism memory Michel Foucault settler colonialism war ab: This essay stages an encounter between Michel Foucault and Franz Rosenzweig by juxtaposing their parallel observations on the continuity between history and war. While Foucault analyzes the strategies organizing seventeenth-century historical writing about the Norman conquest of England and the Frankish invasion of Gaul, Rosenzweig opposes the warlike progress of Christian history to the eternal peace of Jewish time. Through this comparison, the essay reevaluates the terms governing well-known debates about Jewish history and Jewish memory. It asks what role the concept of "war" has played in the emergence of modern Jewish historicism and the so-called Jewish return to history. The essay concludes by submitting the Israelite conquest of Canaan as a supplement to Foucault's examples and as a critical index of the bellicose grammar underwriting the representation of Jewish history as a field of struggle. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Jewish Quarterly Review is the property of University of Pennsylvania Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Jewish Quarterly Review holder: University of Pennsylvania Press dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|