What Should the Logic Formalizing Human Cognition Look Like? Psychologism as Applying Logic in Cognitive Science.
Contemporary logicians have expanded upon the old notions of psychologism in logic and proposed new, weakened versions of it. Those weakened versions postulate that psychologistic logic does not have to inform about the ontology or metaphysics of reasoning. Instead, logic applied in cognitive scienc...
| Publicado en: | Logic & Logical Philosophy Vol. 33; no. 2; pp. 225 - 263 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Logic & Logical Philosophy
Jun2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=179651611&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 179651611 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 14253305 DS9 jtl: Logic & Logical Philosophy issn: 14253305 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2024 vid: 33 iid: 2 pid: 42904 pub: Logic & Logical Philosophy artinfo: ui: 179651611 10.12775/LLP.2024.007 ppf: 225 ppct: 38 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 4.9MB tig: atl: What Should the Logic Formalizing Human Cognition Look Like? Psychologism as Applying Logic in Cognitive Science. aug: au: Rudnicki, Konrad Łukowski, Piotr affil: Centre for Philosophical Psychology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium Department of Logic, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland su: Cognitive neuroscience Cognitive science Fuzzy logic Logic Cognition sug: subj: Cognitive neuroscience Cognitive science Fuzzy logic Logic Cognition keyword: applied logic cognitive science cognitivism psychologism ab: Contemporary logicians have expanded upon the old notions of psychologism in logic and proposed new, weakened versions of it. Those weakened versions postulate that psychologistic logic does not have to inform about the ontology or metaphysics of reasoning. Instead, logic applied in cognitive science could serve as one of many paradigms for making empirical predictions about the observable process of human reasoning. The purpose of this article is to entertain this notion and answer the question: what properties should a logical system formally representing actual human reasoning have? Based on the existing evidence from cognitive science and neuroscience we identified three potential candidates: context-sensitivity (satisfied for example by adaptive logics), content-sensitivity (satisfied by non-Fregean logics) and probabilism (satisfied for example by fuzzy logics). pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Logic & Logical Philosophy is the property of Logic & Logical Philosophy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Logic & Logical Philosophy holder: Logic & Logical Philosophy dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|