Causes of Unwarranted Variation and Disparity in Breast Cancer Management in Regional and Rural Area.

Introduction. Breast cancer management is complex, requiring personalised care from multidisciplinary teams. Research shows that there is unwarranted clinical variation in mastectomy rates between rural and metropolitan patients; that is, variation in treatment which cannot be explained by disease p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Breast Journal Vol. 2024; pp. 1 - 10
Autores principales: Davis, Kimberley J., Campbell, Chantal, Costelloe, Rebekah, Song, Ting, Fylyk, Glaucia, Yu, Ping, Craig, Steven J., Yang, Guan-Jun
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell 6/19/2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=179673968&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 179673968
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1075122X
        ET6
      jtl: Breast Journal
      issn: 1075122X
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 6/19/2024
      vid: 2024
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        179673968
        179673968
        179673968
        10.1155/2024/9354395
        179673968
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Causes of Unwarranted Variation and Disparity in Breast Cancer Management in Regional and Rural Area.
      aug:
        au:
          Davis, Kimberley J.
          Campbell, Chantal
          Costelloe, Rebekah
          Song, Ting
          Fylyk, Glaucia
          Yu, Ping
          Craig, Steven J.
          Yang, Guan-Jun
        affil: Research Operations Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District Wollongong NSW, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Breast Neoplasms Therapy
          Healthcare Disparities
          Rural Areas Australia
          Urban Areas
          Treatment Outcomes
          Human
          Female
          Australia
          Retrospective Design
          Descriptive Statistics
          Record Review
          Comparative Studies
          Funding Source
          Financial Stress
          Sociodemographic Factors
          Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
          Female
      ab: Introduction. Breast cancer management is complex, requiring personalised care from multidisciplinary teams. Research shows that there is unwarranted clinical variation in mastectomy rates between rural and metropolitan patients; that is, variation in treatment which cannot be explained by disease progression or medical necessity. This study aims to determine the clinical and nonclinical factors contributing to any unwarranted variation in breast cancer management in rural patients and to evaluate how these factors and variations relate to patient outcomes. Methods. Comprehensive data from patients who had primary breast cancer surgery from 2010 to 2014 in either a rural or metropolitan location in a single local health district was analysed (n = 686). Records were subset into two rurality groupings based on the postcode in which the patient resided, and the Modified Monash Model (MMM), an Australian system for classifying rurality. Statistical analysis was used to compare rural and metropolitan cohorts on treatments, patient characteristics, timeliness, and outcomes (recurrence and survival). Results. Rural patients had higher mastectomy rates than metropolitan patients (57% vs. 34%, p < 0.001), despite a lack of difference in clinical or demographic factors accounting for such variation. The length of time between treatment pathway stages was consistently longer amongst rural patients (p < 0.01). Rural women also had worse survival outcomes, especially amongst HER2‐positive patients who had significantly lower survival (5‐year 74% vs 82%; 10‐year 49% vs 71%, p < 0.05) than metropolitan HER2‐positive patients. Conclusion. This study reveals clinical disparities among rural breast cancer patients, that cannot be explained by demographic and clinical factors alone. Rural patients face lower rates of breast‐conserving surgery and treatment delays, attributable to systemic barriers such as limited access to specialist care, high travel costs, and suboptimal care coordination. These findings have important implications for improving equity and collaboration in delivering person‐centred breast cancer care.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N