Social framing effects in leadership by example: Preferences or beliefs?
We study the impact of framing on leading‐by‐example. Our 2 × 2 design consists of group level frames (Wall Street vs. Community) and individual level frames (First/Second Movers vs. Leader/Followers). We report on two studies where we elicit participants' beliefs allowing us to evaluate whether fra...
| Published in: | Economic Inquiry Vol. 62; no. 4; pp. 1629 - 1652 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Oct2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=179808511&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 179808511 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00952583 EIQ jtl: Economic Inquiry issn: 00952583 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Oct2024 vid: 62 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 179808511 10.1111/ecin.13249 ppf: 1629 ppct: 23 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: C – @attributes: type: P size: 703KB tig: atl: Social framing effects in leadership by example: Preferences or beliefs? aug: au: Cartwright, Edward Drouvelis, Michalis affil: Department of Economics and Marketing, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK Department of Economics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK CESifo, Munich, Germany su: Frames (Social sciences) Common good Guilt (Psychology) Aversion Storage & moving industry sug: subj: Frames (Social sciences) Common good Guilt (Psychology) Other Warehousing and Storage General Warehousing and Storage Used Household and Office Goods Moving Other business support services Aversion Storage & moving industry keyword: beliefs experiment framing guilt aversion leadership public good beliefs experiment framing guilt aversion leadership public good ab: We study the impact of framing on leading‐by‐example. Our 2 × 2 design consists of group level frames (Wall Street vs. Community) and individual level frames (First/Second Movers vs. Leader/Followers). We report on two studies where we elicit participants' beliefs allowing us to evaluate whether framing effects are driven by beliefs or preferences. Across both studies, average contributions are significantly lower in the Community—First Mover frame. This is primarily because leaders contribute less, pulling down followers' contributions. We find that contributions are strongly related to first order and second order beliefs but framing effects remain once we control for beliefs. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|