Philosophy as a Science and as a Humanity.

This commentary on Philip Kitcher's book What's the Use of Philosophy? addresses two questions. First, must philosophers be methodologically self-conscious to do good work? Second, is there value in the questions pursued in the traditional areas of analytic philosophy?

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophia Vol. 52; no. 3; pp. 537 - 545
Autor principal: Strevens, Michael
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jul2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=179813989&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 179813989
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00483893
        1VPF
      jtl: Philosophia
      issn: 00483893
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2024
      vid: 52
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        179813989
        10.1007/s11406-024-00720-w
      ppf: 537
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 553KB
      tig:
        atl: Philosophy as a Science and as a Humanity.
      aug:
        au: Strevens, Michael
        affil: https://ror.org/0190ak572 Department of Philosophy, New York University, New York, NY, USA
      su:
        Humanity
        Kitcher, Philip, 1947-
        Analytic philosophy
        Modern philosophy
        Theory of knowledge
      sug:
        subj:
          Humanity
          Kitcher, Philip, 1947-
          Analytic philosophy
          Modern philosophy
          Theory of knowledge
      keyword:
        Analytic epistemology
        Conceptual analysis
        Method of cases
        Philip Kitcher
        Philosophical methodology
      ab: This commentary on Philip Kitcher's book What's the Use of Philosophy? addresses two questions. First, must philosophers be methodologically self-conscious to do good work? Second, is there value in the questions pursued in the traditional areas of analytic philosophy?
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophia is a copyright of Springer, 2024. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophia
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N