Repeat, Reproduce, Replicate.
This article presents a question from a reader about the quality of code presented in research articles in terms of its reproducibility. The answer to the question takes a look at the Association of Computing Machinery’s badging system for software artifacts, scientific method and the “publish or pe...
| Publicado en: | Communications of the ACM Vol. 67; no. 10; pp. 29 - 31 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Opinion |
| Publicado: |
Association for Computing Machinery
Oct2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=179943083&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 179943083 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00010782 ACM jtl: Communications of the ACM issn: 00010782 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2024 vid: 67 iid: 10 pid: 68 pub: Association for Computing Machinery artinfo: ui: 179943083 10.1145/3685699 ppf: 29 ppct: 2 formats: tig: atl: Repeat, Reproduce, Replicate. aug: au: Neville-Neil, George V. affil: Neville-Neil Consulting, Brooklyn, NY, USA su: Computer programming Scholarly publishing Reproducible research Academic discourse sug: subj: Computer programming Scholarly publishing Reproducible research Academic discourse ab: This article presents a question from a reader about the quality of code presented in research articles in terms of its reproducibility. The answer to the question takes a look at the Association of Computing Machinery’s badging system for software artifacts, scientific method and the “publish or perish” mentality in academia. pubtype: Periodical doctype: Opinion src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|