More on knowledge before Gettier.
Antognazza ("The Benefit to Philosophy", "The Distinction in Kind"), Dutant ("The Legend"), and I ("Knowledge Before Gettier") have argued for the historical falsity of the claim that, prior to Gettier's famous counterexamples of sixty years ago, the so-called 'traditional' conception of knowledge w...
| Publicado en: | British Journal for the History of Philosophy Vol. 32; no. 5; pp. 1145 - 1154 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Sep2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=180041144&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 180041144 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 09608788 5AX jtl: British Journal for the History of Philosophy issn: 09608788 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Sep2024 vid: 32 iid: 5 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 180041144 10.1080/09608788.2023.2247450 ppf: 1145 ppct: 9 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 638KB tig: atl: More on knowledge before Gettier. aug: au: Le Morvan, Pierre affil: Department of Philosophy, Religion, and Classical Studies, The College of New Jersey, Ewing Township, NJ, USA su: Gettier, Edmund Theory of knowledge Philosophical literature Truth Belief & doubt sug: subj: Gettier, Edmund Theory of knowledge Philosophical literature Truth Belief & doubt keyword: belief Gettier justification knowledge truth ab: Antognazza ("The Benefit to Philosophy", "The Distinction in Kind"), Dutant ("The Legend"), and I ("Knowledge Before Gettier") have argued for the historical falsity of the claim that, prior to Gettier's famous counterexamples of sixty years ago, the so-called 'traditional' conception of knowledge was the justified true belief (JTB) conception. This note addresses a related historical question that, rather surprisingly, has not yet been addressed in the philosophical literature; to wit: when did this claim first appear in this literature? pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of British Journal for the History of Philosophy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: British Journal for the History of Philosophy holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|