The metaphysics science needs: Deleuze's naturalism.

This article is aimed at those interested in the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and the sciences—and this includes philosophers of science working out of the analytic tradition. Deleuze's writings are riddled with references to science and mathematics. And yet, the relation between these references an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Journal of Philosophy Vol. 32; no. 3; pp. 820 - 847
Autor principal: Webster, George
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=180048283&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 180048283
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09668373
        7PU
      jtl: European Journal of Philosophy
      issn: 09668373
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2024
      vid: 32
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        180048283
        10.1111/ejop.12909
      ppf: 820
      ppct: 27
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 2.4MB
      tig:
        atl: The metaphysics science needs: Deleuze's naturalism.
      aug:
        au: Webster, George
        affil: Keble College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
      su:
        Metaphysics
        Deleuze, Gilles, 1925-1995
        Philosophy
        Science
        Naturalism
      sug:
        subj:
          Metaphysics
          Deleuze, Gilles, 1925-1995
          Philosophy
          Science
          Naturalism
      ab: This article is aimed at those interested in the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and the sciences—and this includes philosophers of science working out of the analytic tradition. Deleuze's writings are riddled with references to science and mathematics. And yet, the relation between these references and his philosophical thought is not well understood. In this essay, I investigate the nature of this relation—and I do so by asking whether it is naturalistic. Importantly, I draw on insights from contemporary philosophy of science to contribute to a proper understanding of this issue. I show that and how commentators are hamstrung by their lack of engagement with the philosophy of science; I present an interpretation of Deleuze's philosophical project as attempting to articulate an immanent and primitive form of objective modality; I draw together parts of Deleuze's corpus that are relevant to his treatment of the sciences but are nonetheless rarely studied in conjunction (including his and Guattari's distinction between 'major' and 'minor' science and his under‐scrutinized statement of interest in 'the metaphysics science needs'); and I propose a naturalistic interpretation of his engagements with science.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of European Journal of Philosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: European Journal of Philosophy
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N