Null objects, null nominal anaphora and antilogophoricity.

This paper discusses null objects (NOs) in Ibero-Romance. European Portuguese (EP) has both definite and indefinte NOs, but Castillian Spanish (CSpanish) only allows NOs when the antecedent is a bare plural nominal or a mass noun. The paper argues that these differences are related to the distributi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Probus: International Journal of Latin & Romance Linguistics Vol. 36; no. 2; pp. 251 - 282
Autor principal: Barbosa, Pilar
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: De Gruyter Sep2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=180210161&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 180210161
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09214771
        KU3
      jtl: Probus: International Journal of Latin & Romance Linguistics
      issn: 09214771
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2024
      vid: 36
      iid: 2
      pid: 1734
      pub: De Gruyter
    artinfo:
      ui:
        180210161
        10.1515/probus-2024-2012
      ppf: 251
      ppct: 31
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Null objects, null nominal anaphora and antilogophoricity.
      aug:
        au: Barbosa, Pilar
        affil: ELACH/CEHUM, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal
      su:
        Anaphora (Linguistics)
        Portuguese language
        Nominals (Grammar)
        Spanish language
        Nouns
      sug:
        subj:
          Anaphora (Linguistics)
          Portuguese language
          Nominals (Grammar)
          Spanish language
          Nouns
      keyword:
        anti-logophoricity
        epithets
        nominal anaphora
        null objects
      ab: This paper discusses null objects (NOs) in Ibero-Romance. European Portuguese (EP) has both definite and indefinte NOs, but Castillian Spanish (CSpanish) only allows NOs when the antecedent is a bare plural nominal or a mass noun. The paper argues that these differences are related to the distribution of bare nominals in each language and proposes that the same underlying mechanism is at the root of indefinite and definite object drop, namely a rootless [n ] proform. [n ] denotes a contextually salient property, its possible interpretations being derived by general type-shifting operations. In CSpanish, the property denoted by [n ] is interpreted as a restrictive modifier of the predicate and the relevant variable is bound under VP level Existential Closure. Focusing on EP, there are striking similarities between definite NOs and other types of nominal anaphora, including epithets. In particular, like epithets, NOs are subject to an Antilogophoricity Constraint. This affinity between NOs and epithets constitutes a case in favor of the idea that the NO is a base-generated nominal. The difference with respect to CSpanish lies in the possibility of interpreting the null nominal by a choice function, a function maps a property onto an entity that has the property.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N