Comparative effectiveness of extended‐release naltrexone and sublingual buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder among Medicaid patients.

Background and aims: Extended‐release naltrexone (XR‐NTX) and sublingual buprenorphine (SL‐BUP) are both approved for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment in any medical setting. We aimed to compare the real‐world effectiveness of XR‐NTX and SL‐BUP. Design and setting: This was an observational activ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Addiction Vol. 119; no. 11; pp. 1975 - 1987
Autores principales: Ross, Rachael K., Nunes, Edward V., Olfson, Mark, Shulman, Matisyahu, Krawczyk, Noa, Stuart, Elizabeth A., Rudolph, Kara E.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Nov2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=180294039&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 180294039
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09652140
        AIO
      jtl: Addiction
      issn: 09652140
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2024
      vid: 119
      iid: 11
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        180294039
        178803909
        180294039
        180294039
        10.1111/add.16630
        180294039
      ppf: 1975
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Comparative effectiveness of extended‐release naltrexone and sublingual buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder among Medicaid patients.
      aug:
        au:
          Ross, Rachael K.
          Nunes, Edward V.
          Olfson, Mark
          Shulman, Matisyahu
          Krawczyk, Noa
          Stuart, Elizabeth A.
          Rudolph, Kara E.
        affil: Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York NY,, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Naltrexone Administration and Dosage
          Buprenorphine Administration and Dosage
          Administration, Sublingual
          Substance Use Disorders Drug Therapy
          Medicaid New Jersey
          Medicaid California
          Treatment Outcomes
          Medication Compliance
          Overdose Risk Factors
          Human
          Nonexperimental Studies
          Prospective Studies
          Billing and Claims
          New Jersey
          California
          Adult
          Adolescence
          Middle Age
          Death Risk Factors
          Risk Assessment
          Descriptive Statistics
          Confidence Intervals
          Comparative Studies
          Funding Source
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
      ab: Background and aims: Extended‐release naltrexone (XR‐NTX) and sublingual buprenorphine (SL‐BUP) are both approved for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment in any medical setting. We aimed to compare the real‐world effectiveness of XR‐NTX and SL‐BUP. Design and setting: This was an observational active comparator, new user cohort study of Medicaid claims records for patients in New Jersey and California, USA, 2016–19. Participants/cases: The participants were adult Medicaid patients aged 18–64 years who initiated XR‐NTX or SL‐BUP for maintenance treatment of OUD and did not use medications for OUD in the 90 days before initiation. Our cohort included 1755 XR‐NTX and 9886 SL‐BUP patients. Measurements: We examined two outcomes up to 180 days after medication initiation: (1) composite of medication discontinuation and death and (2) composite of overdose and death. Findings In adjusted analyses, treatment with XR‐NTX was more likely to result in discontinuation or death by the end of follow‐up than treatment with SL‐BUP: cumulative risk 75.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 73.9%, 77.9%] versus 62.2% (95% CI = 61.2%, 63.2%), respectively (risk difference = 13.7 percentage points, 95% CI = 11.4, 16.0). There was minimal difference in the cumulative risk of overdose or death by the end of follow‐up: XR‐NTX 3.9% (95% CI = 3.0%, 4.8%) versus SL‐BUP 3.3% (95% CI = 2.9%, 3.7%); risk difference = 0.5 percentage points, 95% CI = –0.4, 1.5. Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Medicaid patients in California and New Jersey, USA, receiving treatment for opioid use disorder stayed in treatment longer on sublingual buprenorphine than on extended‐release naltrexone, but the risk of overdose was similar. Most patients in this study discontinued medication within 6 months, regardless of which medication was initiated.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N