One Score to Rule Them All? Comparing the Predictive and Concurrent Validity of 30 Hearts and Flowers Scoring Approaches.
The Hearts and Flowers (H&F) task is a computerized executive functioning (EF) assessment that has been used to measure EF from early childhood to adulthood. It provides data on accuracy and reaction time (RT) across three different task blocks (hearts, flowers, and mixed). However, there is a lack...
| Published in: | Assessment Vol. 31; no. 8; pp. 1702 - 1721 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Sage Publications Inc.
Dec2024
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=180332478&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 180332478 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10731911 G70 jtl: Assessment issn: 10731911 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Dec2024 vid: 31 iid: 8 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 180332478 175476071 180332478 180332478 10.1177/10731911241229566 180332478 ppf: 1702 ppct: 19 formats: tig: atl: One Score to Rule Them All? Comparing the Predictive and Concurrent Validity of 30 Hearts and Flowers Scoring Approaches. aug: au: Wu, Tiffany Weiland, Christina McCormick, Meghan Hsueh, JoAnn Snow, Catherine Sachs, Jason affil: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA sug: subj: Concurrent Validity Predictive Validity Executive Function Neuropsychological Tests Reaction Time Task Performance and Analysis Human Male Female Funding Source Consensus Exploratory Research Outcome Assessment Descriptive Statistics Male Female ab: The Hearts and Flowers (H&F) task is a computerized executive functioning (EF) assessment that has been used to measure EF from early childhood to adulthood. It provides data on accuracy and reaction time (RT) across three different task blocks (hearts, flowers, and mixed). However, there is a lack of consensus in the field on how to score the task that makes it difficult to interpret findings across studies. The current study, which includes a demographically diverse population of kindergarteners from Boston Public Schools (N = 946), compares the predictive and concurrent validity of 30 ways of scoring H&F, each with a different combination of accuracy, RT, and task block(s). Our exploratory results provide evidence supporting the use of a two-vector average score based on Zelazo et al.'s approach of adding accuracy and RT scores together only after individuals pass a certain accuracy threshold. Findings have implications for scoring future tablet-based developmental assessments. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|