One Score to Rule Them All? Comparing the Predictive and Concurrent Validity of 30 Hearts and Flowers Scoring Approaches.

The Hearts and Flowers (H&F) task is a computerized executive functioning (EF) assessment that has been used to measure EF from early childhood to adulthood. It provides data on accuracy and reaction time (RT) across three different task blocks (hearts, flowers, and mixed). However, there is a lack...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Assessment Vol. 31; no. 8; pp. 1702 - 1721
Main Authors: Wu, Tiffany, Weiland, Christina, McCormick, Meghan, Hsueh, JoAnn, Snow, Catherine, Sachs, Jason
Format: equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Sage Publications Inc. Dec2024
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=180332478&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 180332478
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10731911
        G70
      jtl: Assessment
      issn: 10731911
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2024
      vid: 31
      iid: 8
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        180332478
        175476071
        180332478
        180332478
        10.1177/10731911241229566
        180332478
      ppf: 1702
      ppct: 19
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: One Score to Rule Them All? Comparing the Predictive and Concurrent Validity of 30 Hearts and Flowers Scoring Approaches.
      aug:
        au:
          Wu, Tiffany
          Weiland, Christina
          McCormick, Meghan
          Hsueh, JoAnn
          Snow, Catherine
          Sachs, Jason
        affil: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Concurrent Validity
          Predictive Validity
          Executive Function
          Neuropsychological Tests
          Reaction Time
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Funding Source
          Consensus
          Exploratory Research
          Outcome Assessment
          Descriptive Statistics
          Male
          Female
      ab: The Hearts and Flowers (H&F) task is a computerized executive functioning (EF) assessment that has been used to measure EF from early childhood to adulthood. It provides data on accuracy and reaction time (RT) across three different task blocks (hearts, flowers, and mixed). However, there is a lack of consensus in the field on how to score the task that makes it difficult to interpret findings across studies. The current study, which includes a demographically diverse population of kindergarteners from Boston Public Schools (N = 946), compares the predictive and concurrent validity of 30 ways of scoring H&F, each with a different combination of accuracy, RT, and task block(s). Our exploratory results provide evidence supporting the use of a two-vector average score based on Zelazo et al.'s approach of adding accuracy and RT scores together only after individuals pass a certain accuracy threshold. Findings have implications for scoring future tablet-based developmental assessments.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        equations & formulas
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N