A further investigation regarding the efficacy of and preference for positive and corrective feedback.

Although feedback is a widely used intervention for improving performance, it is unclear what characteristics individuals prefer and what is necessary for it to be effective. The purpose of this study was to systematically extend Simonian and Brand (2022) by addressing the limitations of the study a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) Vol. 57; no. 4; pp. 1070 - 1082
Autores principales: Godinez, Erik S., Brand, Denys, Miguel, Caio F., Penrod, Becky
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Oct2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Although feedback is a widely used intervention for improving performance, it is unclear what characteristics individuals prefer and what is necessary for it to be effective. The purpose of this study was to systematically extend Simonian and Brand (2022) by addressing the limitations of the study and adding a best‐treatment phase. During an acquisition phase, participants received either positive, corrective, or no feedback upon task completion. Nine of 10 participants mastered the task that was associated with corrective feedback, and one participant mastered the task with no feedback. Eight participants completed a preference phase in which they were provided a choice of either positive or corrective feedback when learning to play a novel game. Half of the eight participants showed a preference for corrective feedback, and the remaining participants had mixed preferences. Overall, corrective feedback was more efficacious and more preferred than positive feedback.