Efficacy and Safety of Transthoracic Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for Monitoring Closure of Atrial or Ventricular Septal Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.

Purpose: For the repair of atrial/ventricular septal defects (ASD/VSD), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is easy to perform, cost‐effective, and does not require general anesthesia and intubation. Still, TTE is not universally accepted. To compare efficacy and safety of TTE versus transesophagea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Echocardiography Vol. 41; no. 10; pp. 1 - 11
Autores principales: Ben, Lele, Zhang, Yuanhao, Wang, Yu, Xing, Weizhen, Cai, Jianping, Han, Yu
Formato: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Oct2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=180410751&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 180410751
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07422822
        GSE
      jtl: Echocardiography
      issn: 07422822
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2024
      vid: 41
      iid: 10
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        180410751
        180410751
        180410751
        10.1111/echo.15955
        180410751
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Efficacy and Safety of Transthoracic Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for Monitoring Closure of Atrial or Ventricular Septal Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.
      aug:
        au:
          Ben, Lele
          Zhang, Yuanhao
          Wang, Yu
          Xing, Weizhen
          Cai, Jianping
          Han, Yu
        affil: Department of Structural Heart Disease, Central China Fuwai Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou Henan, , China
      sug:
        subj:
          Echocardiography
          Echocardiography, Transesophageal
          Heart Septal Defects, Atrial Surgery
          Heart Septal Defects, Ventricular Surgery
          Patient Safety
          Treatment Outcomes
          Funding Source
          Human
          Systematic Review
          Meta Analysis
          PubMed
          Embase
          Cochrane Library
          Treatment Complications, Delayed
          Treatment Duration
          Fluoroscopy
          Odds Ratio
          Confidence Intervals
          Descriptive Statistics
      ab: Purpose: For the repair of atrial/ventricular septal defects (ASD/VSD), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is easy to perform, cost‐effective, and does not require general anesthesia and intubation. Still, TTE is not universally accepted. To compare efficacy and safety of TTE versus transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to guide percutaneous ASD/VSD closure. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for articles published from their inception to December 2023. The primary outcome was the procedural success rate. The secondary outcomes were residual shunt, late complications, procedure time, and fluoroscopy time. All meta‐analyses were performed using a random‐effects model. Results: Eight studies and 1295 patients were included. There were no significant differences between TTE and TEE regarding the procedural success rate (OR = 1.93, 95% CI: 0.90–4.13, p = 0.092; I2 = 52.2%, Pheterogeneity = 0.063) and residual shunt rate (OR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.38–1.76, p = 0.600; I2 = 0%, Pheterogeneity = 0.518). Compared with TEE, TTE reduced the frequency of late complications (OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.14–0.43, p < 0.001; I2 = 13.8%, Pheterogeneity = 0.326), reduced the procedure time (WMD = −8.92, 95% CI: −12.08, −5.75, p < 0.001; I2 = 87.4%, Pheterogeneity < 0.001), and reduced the fluoroscopy time (WMD = −5.08, 95% CI: −9.59, −0.56, p = 0.028; I2 = 95.6%, Pheterogeneity < 0.001). The sensitivity analyses showed that the results of the meta‐analyses were robust. Conclusion: Compared with TEE, TTE showed no differences regarding the rates of success and residual shunt, but there were lower rates of late complications and shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        meta analysis
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N