Conditions for acceptability of technology in telecare: And the demise of acceptance...9th World Conference of the International Society for Gerontechnology (ISG), June 18-21, 2014, Taipei, Taiwan.

Purpose What motivates older people accept telecare? In recent years, acceptance models, such as TAM1 and UTAUT2 with many variations, have been widely employed to uncover these factors. Nevertheless, it also appears that an un-parsimonious number of factors might be operating3, that the predictions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gerontechnology Vol. 13; no. 2; pp. 171 - 172
Main Author: BOUWHUIS, D. G.
Format: abstract proceedings Journal Article
Published: International Society for Gerontechnology 2014 Special Issue
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=180444807&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 180444807
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15691101
        904R
      jtl: Gerontechnology
      issn: 15691101
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2014 Special Issue
      vid: 13
      iid: 2
      pid: 54298
      pub: International Society for Gerontechnology
    artinfo:
      ui:
        180444807
        180444807
        180444807
        10.4017/gt.2014.13.02.423.00
        180444807
      ppf: 171
      ppct: 1
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Conditions for acceptability of technology in telecare: And the demise of acceptance...9th World Conference of the International Society for Gerontechnology (ISG), June 18-21, 2014, Taipei, Taiwan.
      aug:
        au: BOUWHUIS, D. G.
        affil: Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
      sug:
        subj:
          Gerontologic Care
          Telehealth Utilization
          Motivation
          Consumer Attitudes
          Congresses and Conferences Taiwan
          Taiwan
          Aged
          Aged: 65+ years
      ab: Purpose What motivates older people accept telecare? In recent years, acceptance models, such as TAM1 and UTAUT2 with many variations, have been widely employed to uncover these factors. Nevertheless, it also appears that an un-parsimonious number of factors might be operating3, that the predictions of telecare acceptance and use were only reasonable but never good, and that the associated attitudes were unstable. In fact, it has become much clearer which factors cause people to reject telecare, rather than accept it. This discussion has largely ignored the fact that the end users acceptance of telecare is only one aspect of the opinions of many stakeholders related to the process of implementing telecare. Currently, telecare is a multi-sectoral issue, in which representatives of very different (economic) sectors have to cooperate, which enforces a range of often non-intuitive acceptances, rather than just one. Another issue is that the composition and operation of a telecare system is not stable over time, but is subject to increasingly rapid and changing technological developments. The question becomes, "How will the processes of acceptance of telecare, and the opinions of stakeholders change as a result of technological progress?" Method A literature survey was conducted to determine the number of sizeable telecare applications currently available, (such as WSD4 and Veteran Administration Hospital's CCHT) and their properties, problems and progress over time. In addition, a number of clients involved in a telecare program were followed5 over a two-year period, covering installation to long-term use. Results In all cases studied, only a fraction of all eligible clients actually used telecare devices, reductions in cost of care were modest or absent, while investment and equipment costs would mostly be offset by savings from the costs of traditional care. While it is clear that an effective telecare business model is almost always lacking; the multi-sectoral nature of telecare makes significant cost savings all but impossible. Some observers have stated that the high investment cost of telecare medical devices can only be reduced by a transition from professional systems to consumer products. In quite a number of cases this has already materialized, e.g., in the use of webcams and wireless IP networking. Considering the professional nature of many telecare components, such as the costs of installation, the needs for a network and devices, and the interconnection and interoperability of various parts of the systems, solutions that can forego their associated problems would significantly reduce telecare costs. One such solution has been the introduction of IP and Bluetooth networks that have eclipsed the far more expensive conventional home networking systems. Another promising development is the use of tablets that feature an intuitive control interface; this method also appeals strongly to older people. Many telecare functions could be implemented as apps, while the tablet is connected with very inexpensive remote sensors, and provides immediate and understandable feedback to the client and to a remote care provider. The client considers the tablet as his or her property and in that sense does not need to accept it, such as no one accepts a TV set, but wants to have and use it. Such a method of implementation will change the telecare system and stakeholder's role beyond recognition. The client, then, would have the telecare system in his own hands, literally and figuratively. Finally, it appears that in all acceptance models related to telecare, as well as in innovation and diffusion theory, a hidden assumption of unchanging and established technology is widely and erroneously accepted making predicted acceptance continually lag behind the actual developments.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        abstract
        proceedings
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N