How Do Australians Manage Diagnostic Testing Risks? Focus Groups Linked to a Model of Behaviour Change.

Background: Diagnostic tests carry significant risks, and communications are needed to help lay people consider these. The development of communications has been hindered by poor knowledge about how lay people understand and negotiate testing risks. We examined lay Australians' perceptions of diagno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Health Expectations Vol. 27; no. 5; pp. 1 - 14
Autores principales: Rozbroj, Tomas, Parker, Catriona, Haas, Romi, Wallis, Jason A., Buchbinder, Rachelle, O'Connor, Denise A.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Oct2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=180520965&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 180520965
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13696513
        EVY
      jtl: Health Expectations
      issn: 13696513
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2024
      vid: 27
      iid: 5
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        180520965
        180520965
        180520965
        10.1111/hex.70038
        180520965
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: How Do Australians Manage Diagnostic Testing Risks? Focus Groups Linked to a Model of Behaviour Change.
      aug:
        au:
          Rozbroj, Tomas
          Parker, Catriona
          Haas, Romi
          Wallis, Jason A.
          Buchbinder, Rachelle
          O'Connor, Denise A.
        affil: School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne Victoria, , Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Diagnostic Tests, Routine Psychosocial Factors
          Australians Psychosocial Factors
          Health Screening
          Behavioral Changes
          Risk Assessment
          Human
          Funding Source
          Australia
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Qualitative Studies
          Semi-Structured Interview
          Focus Groups
          Descriptive Statistics
          Thematic Analysis
          Surveys
          Videorecording
          Audiorecording
          Clinical Reasoning
          Judgment
          Physician-Patient Relations
          Information Needs
          Patient Preference
          Decision Making, Clinical
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Diagnostic tests carry significant risks, and communications are needed to help lay people consider these. The development of communications has been hindered by poor knowledge about how lay people understand and negotiate testing risks. We examined lay Australians' perceptions of diagnostic testing risks and how these risks are managed. Method: We completed 12 semistructured online focus groups with 61 Australian adults (18+) between April and June 2022. Participants were divided into younger/older (> 50 years) and male/female groups. Using semistructured discussion and exploring two hypothetical scenarios, we examined attitudes to diagnostic tests, their risks and how test risks were managed. Themes were identified, subanalysed to identify age and gender differences and mapped to the COM‐B model of behaviour change. Results: The six themes provided detailed accounts of how participants considered themselves able, empowered and assertive when negotiating testing risks and of complex ways in which relationships with health workers, personal experiences and structural factors influenced negotiating testing risks. COM‐B identified multiple opportunities for leveraging these lay beliefs in health promotion. It also identified barriers, including narrow concepts of testing risks, challenges during shared decision‐making and overestimation of personal influence on testing decisions. Significance: Our findings matter because they are a novel, detailed account of testing risk beliefs, linked to a model for behaviour change. This will directly inform development of test risk/benefit communications, which are a research priority. Public Contribution: The study design enabled participants to influence the discussion agenda, and they could comment on the analysis. Participants contributed insights about their needs, beliefs and experiences related to medical testing, and these will be used to shape future patient‐centred decision tools.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N