HOW PRACTICES MAKE PRINCIPLES AND HOW PRINCIPLES MAKE RULES.

In the article "HOW PRACTICES MAKE PRINCIPLES AND HOW PRINCIPLES MAKE RULES" by Mitchell N. Berman, published in the Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy, the author introduces the theory of "principled positivism" to explain how legal norms are determined by actions, mental states, and moral notio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy Vol. 28; no. 3; pp. 299 - 357
Autor principal: Berman, Mitchell N.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy Oct2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:In the article "HOW PRACTICES MAKE PRINCIPLES AND HOW PRINCIPLES MAKE RULES" by Mitchell N. Berman, published in the Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy, the author introduces the theory of "principled positivism" to explain how legal norms are determined by actions, mental states, and moral notions. The article challenges traditional legal theories by arguing that they may not fully account for the existence of legal principles and the operation of legal rules. By examining US Supreme Court cases, the text explores the relationship between legal principles and rules, emphasizing the importance of understanding how principles shape legal outcomes and influence judicial decision-making.