Quantitative Computed Tomography and Response to Pronation in COVID-19 ARDS.

BACKGROUND: The use of prone position (PP) has been widespread during the COVID-19 pandemic. Whereas it has demonstrated benefits, including improved oxygenation and lung aeration, the factors influencing the response in terms of gas exchange to PP remain unclear. In particular, the association betw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Respiratory Care Vol. 69; no. 11; pp. 1380 - 1392
Autores principales: Zadek, Francesco, Berta, Luca, Zorzi, Giulia, Ubiali, Stefania, Bonaiti, Amos, Tundo, Giulia, Brunoni, Beatrice, Marrazzo, Francesco, Giudici, Riccardo, Rossi, Anna, Rizzetto, Francesco, Bernasconi, Davide Paolo, Vanzulli, Angelo, Colombo, Paola Enrica, Fumagalli, Roberto, Torresin, Alberto, Langer, Thomas
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Nov2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=180579725&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 180579725
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00201324
        4GG
      jtl: Respiratory Care
      issn: 00201324
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2024
      vid: 69
      iid: 11
      pid: 1365
      pub: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
      place: New Rochelle, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        180579725
        180579725
        180579725
        10.4187/respcare.11625
        180579725
      ppf: 1380
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Quantitative Computed Tomography and Response to Pronation in COVID-19 ARDS.
      aug:
        au:
          Zadek, Francesco
          Berta, Luca
          Zorzi, Giulia
          Ubiali, Stefania
          Bonaiti, Amos
          Tundo, Giulia
          Brunoni, Beatrice
          Marrazzo, Francesco
          Giudici, Riccardo
          Rossi, Anna
          Rizzetto, Francesco
          Bernasconi, Davide Paolo
          Vanzulli, Angelo
          Colombo, Paola Enrica
          Fumagalli, Roberto
          Torresin, Alberto
          Langer, Thomas
      sug:
        subj:
          Tomography, X-Ray Computed Methods
          Prone Position
          Patient Positioning
          COVID-19 Complications
          Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Acute
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Ventilator Patients
          Retrospective Design
          Record Review
          Nonexperimental Studies
          Blood Gas Analysis
          Pulmonary Gas Exchange
          T-Tests
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          Analysis of Variance
          Kruskal-Wallis Test
          Chi Square Test
          Fisher's Exact Test
          Linear Regression
          Descriptive Statistics
          Italy
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: BACKGROUND: The use of prone position (PP) has been widespread during the COVID-19 pandemic. Whereas it has demonstrated benefits, including improved oxygenation and lung aeration, the factors influencing the response in terms of gas exchange to PP remain unclear. In particular, the association between baseline quantitative computed tomography (CT) scan results and gas exchange response to PP in invasively ventilated subjects with COVID-19 ARDS is unknown. The present study aimed to compare baseline quantitative CT results between subjects responding to PP in terms of oxygenation or CO2 clearance and those who did not. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective observational study including critically ill, invasively ventilated subjects with COVID-19-related ARDS admitted to the ICUs of Niguarda Hospital between March 2020-November 2021. Blood gas samples were collected before and after PP. Subjects in whom the PaO2 /FIO2 increase was ≥ 20 mm Hg after PP were defined as oxygen responders. CO2 responders were defined when the ventilatory ratio (VR) decreased during PP. Automated quantitative CT analyses were performed to obtain tissue mass and density of the lungs. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five subjects were enrolled, of which 116 (93%) were O2 responders and 51 (41%) CO2 responders. No difference in quantitative CT characteristics and oxygen were observed between responders and non-responders (tissue mass 1,532 ± 396 g vs 1,654 ± 304 g, P = .28; density -544 ± 109 HU vs -562 ± 58 HU P = .42). Similar findings were observed when dividing the population according to CO2 response (tissue mass 1,551 ± 412 g vs 1,534 ± 377 g, P = .89; density -545 ± 123 HU vs -546 ± 94 HU, P = .99). CONCLUSIONS: Most subjects with COVID-19-related ARDS improved their oxygenation at the first pronation cycle. The study suggests that baseline quantitative CT scan data were not associated with the response to PP in oxygenation or CO2 in mechanically ventilated subjects with COVID-19-related ARDS.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N