POLANYI AND PARTICIPATORY KNOWING: A RESPONSE TO JACOB SHERMAN'S "POLANYI AND THE PARTICIPATORY TURN: REIMAGINING RELIGIOUS STUDIES".
As background for explaining what The Participatory Turn is all about, Jacob Sherman does a marvelous job of situating and clarifying current controversies in religious studies methodology. As well, he does a marvelous job in showing how Bruno Latour's bracing explanation of the predicament of moder...
| Publicado en: | Tradition & Discovery Vol. 50; pp. 116 - 122 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Polanyi Society
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=180579826&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 180579826 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10571027 1HK2 jtl: Tradition & Discovery issn: 10571027 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2024 vid: 50 pid: 26331 pub: Polanyi Society artinfo: ui: 180579826 ppf: 116 ppct: 6 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 603KB tig: atl: POLANYI AND PARTICIPATORY KNOWING: A RESPONSE TO JACOB SHERMAN'S "POLANYI AND THE PARTICIPATORY TURN: REIMAGINING RELIGIOUS STUDIES". aug: au: Cannon, Dale su: Latour, Bruno, 1947-2022 Tacit knowledge Religious studies Scientific knowledge Modernity sug: subj: Latour, Bruno, 1947-2022 Tacit knowledge Religious studies Scientific knowledge Modernity keyword: Bruno Latour collaboration between Participatory Turn scholars and Polanyi scholars enactive realism Jacob Sherman Jorge Ferrer novel metaphysical/ontological possibilities susceptibility of reality to a variety of enactions The Participatory Turn transcending subject-less objectivity and non-objectifying subjectivity verification vs. validation controversy ab: As background for explaining what The Participatory Turn is all about, Jacob Sherman does a marvelous job of situating and clarifying current controversies in religious studies methodology. As well, he does a marvelous job in showing how Bruno Latour's bracing explanation of the predicament of modern culture illuminates Polanyi's enterprise in developing, first, a post-critical philosophy that counteracts the predicament of modernity and, second, a convincing, constructive post-modern (i.e., post-critical) account of the personal, tacit, and fiduciary coefficient of knowledge in its many forms, especially scientific knowledge. His account of Polanyi's philosophical enterprise and Polanyi's understanding of knowing in all of its dimensions is remarkably sophisticated and deep, as fine as any seasoned Polanyi scholar could give. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Tradition & Discovery is the property of Polanyi Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Tradition & Discovery holder: Polanyi Society dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|