A Systematic Review of Brief, Child-Completed Adversity Screening Measures.

Screening measures are increasingly being recommended to identify children who have experienced adversity, as these experiences are associated with a range of health concerns. However, concerns have been raised that many of these measures are not feasible to use in settings where time is limited or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Child & Family Studies Vol. 33; no. 10; pp. 3272 - 3286
Autores principales: Lange, Brittany C. L., Nelson, Ashley, Randall, Kellie G., Connell, Christian M., Lang, Jason M.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Oct2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=180587713&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 180587713
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10621024
        JFM
      jtl: Journal of Child & Family Studies
      issn: 10621024
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2024
      vid: 33
      iid: 10
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        180587713
        10.1007/s10826-024-02905-z
      ppf: 3272
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.2MB
      tig:
        atl: A Systematic Review of Brief, Child-Completed Adversity Screening Measures.
      aug:
        au:
          Lange, Brittany C. L.
          Nelson, Ashley
          Randall, Kellie G.
          Connell, Christian M.
          Lang, Jason M.
        affil:
          Child Health and Development Institute of Connecticut Inc, Farmington, CT, USA
          https://ror.org/04p491231 Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
          https://ror.org/04p491231 Child Maltreatment Solutions Network, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
          https://ror.org/02kzs4y22 Department of Psychiatry, UCONN Health, Farmington, CT, USA
          Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
      su:
        Violence
        Child abuse
        Race
        Emotional trauma
        Psychometrics
        Bullying
        Medical screening
        Discrimination (Sociology)
        Adverse childhood experiences
        Childbirth
        Poverty
        Systematic reviews
        MEDLINE
        Online information services
        Psychology information storage & retrieval systems
      sug:
        subj:
          Violence
          Child abuse
          Race
          Emotional trauma
          Psychometrics
          Bullying
          Medical screening
          Discrimination (Sociology)
          Adverse childhood experiences
          Childbirth
          Poverty
          All Other Miscellaneous Ambulatory Health Care Services
          Systematic reviews
          MEDLINE
          Online information services
          Psychology information storage & retrieval systems
      keyword:
        Adversity
        Children
        Screening
        Systematic review
        Trauma
        Adversity
        Children
        Screening
        Systematic review
        Trauma
      ab: Screening measures are increasingly being recommended to identify children who have experienced adversity, as these experiences are associated with a range of health concerns. However, concerns have been raised that many of these measures are not feasible to use in settings where time is limited or do not have empirical support. Even among screening measures with empirical support deemed to be feasible, there remain significant differences in how adversity is operationalized. This review aimed to identify brief adversity screening measures with psychometric information available and to describe how adversity was operationalized across these measures. Studies were located through eight academic databases, grey literature, and through forward and backwards searching of the reference lists of included studies. Screening, full text review, and data extraction were completed independently by two authors. In total, 42 studies describing 41 measures were located. The most commonly assessed form of adversity was bullying. Additional forms of adversity assessed for included violence exposure, racial and ethnic discrimination, abuse, multiple forms of adversity, childbirth, neglect, and poverty. Though multiple measures have been developed to assess the same form of adversity, measures assessing a common adversity type frequently contained similar items. Currently, many brief child-completed adversity screening measures exist for bullying. More research is needed to develop brief screening measures for other forms of adversity, to screen for multiple types of adversity at once, or to provide empirical support for existing measures. Highlights: This review identified 41 brief, child-completed adversity measures with at least some empirical support through a comprehensive systematic review of the literature. Measures assessed for bullying, violence exposure, racial and ethnic discrimination, abuse, multiple forms of adversity, childbirth, neglect, and poverty. These screening measures can be used by child-serving professionals to identify children who have experienced adversity and may benefit from additional assessment, support, or services.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N