The effect of target detection task on memory encoding varies in different stimulus onset asynchronies.

The attentional boost effect (ABE) and action-induced memory enhancement (AIME) suggest that memory performance for target-paired items is superior to that for distractor-paired items when participants performed a target detection task and a memory encoding task simultaneously. Though the memory enh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Memory & Cognition Vol. 52; no. 7; pp. 1700 - 1716
Autores principales: Shang, Chenyang, Sun, Meng, Zhang, Qin
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Oct2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=180590079&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 180590079
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0090502X
        MEG
      jtl: Memory & Cognition
      issn: 0090502X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2024
      vid: 52
      iid: 7
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        180590079
        10.3758/s13421-024-01572-1
      ppf: 1700
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.2MB
      tig:
        atl: The effect of target detection task on memory encoding varies in different stimulus onset asynchronies.
      aug:
        au:
          Shang, Chenyang
          Sun, Meng
          Zhang, Qin
        affil:
          https://ror.org/005edt527 Learning and Cognition Key Laboratory of Beijing, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, 100048, Beijing, China
          https://ror.org/03xb04968 The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, 230032, Hefei, Anhui, China
      su:
        Recognition (Psychology)
        Task performance
        Attention
        Analysis of variance
        Affect (Psychology)
        Repeated measures design
        Data analysis
        T-test (Statistics)
        Descriptive statistics
        Experimental design
        Statistics
        Visual perception
        Short-term memory
        Comparative studies
        Reaction time
        Time
      sug:
        subj:
          Recognition (Psychology)
          Task performance
          Attention
          Analysis of variance
          Affect (Psychology)
          Repeated measures design
          Data analysis
          T-test (Statistics)
          Descriptive statistics
          Experimental design
          Statistics
          Visual perception
          Short-term memory
          Comparative studies
          Reaction time
          Time
      keyword:
        Action-induced memory enhancement (AIME)
        Attentional boost effect (ABE)
        Post-response memory enhancement
        Recollection
        Stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA)
        Action-induced memory enhancement (AIME)
        Attentional boost effect (ABE)
        Post-response memory enhancement
        Recollection
        Stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA)
      ab: The attentional boost effect (ABE) and action-induced memory enhancement (AIME) suggest that memory performance for target-paired items is superior to that for distractor-paired items when participants performed a target detection task and a memory encoding task simultaneously. Though the memory enhancement has been well established, the temporal dynamics of how the target detection task influenced memory encoding remains unclear. To investigate this, we manipulated the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between detection stimuli and the words to be memorized using a remember/know study-test paradigm, and we focused primarily on memory performance for the words that appeared after the detection response. The results showed that target-paired memory enhancement was robust from SOA = 0 s to SOA = 0.75 s, but was not significant when examined by itself in Experiment 1A or weakened in Experiment 2 and the conjoint analysis when SOA = 1 s, which were only observed in R responses. The post-response memory enhancement still existed when there was no temporal overlap between the word and target, similar to the magnitude of memory enhancement observed with temporal overlap. These results supported the view that target-paired memory enhancement (recollection rather than familiarity) occurred irrespective of whether the items appeared simultaneously with the targets or within a short period after the response, and the temporal overlap of the word and target was not necessary for post-response memory enhancement.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N