From "Talking Idly" to Realizing the Ben Ti of Knowledge and Action: Comments on Lederman's "What Is the 'Unity' in the 'Unity of Knowledge and Action'?".
Lederman makes a distinction between the ben ti 本體 ("original natural condition") of knowledge and action and the gong fu 工夫 ("training") of knowledge and action, associating "unity" with ben ti and "joint advancement" with gong fu. This essay argues that both "unity" and "joint advancement" are use...
| Publicado en: | Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy Vol. 23; no. 4; pp. 643 - 652 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Dec2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=180626556&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 180626556 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 15403009 RKE jtl: Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy issn: 15403009 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2024 vid: 23 iid: 4 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 180626556 10.1007/s11712-024-09961-8 ppf: 643 ppct: 9 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 768KB tig: atl: From "Talking Idly" to Realizing the Ben Ti of Knowledge and Action: Comments on Lederman's "What Is the 'Unity' in the 'Unity of Knowledge and Action'?". aug: au: Liu, Liangjian affil: https://ror.org/02n96ep67 Institute of Modern Chinese Thought and Culture/Department of Philosophy, East China Normal University, 500 Dongchuan Road, 200241, Shanghai, P. R. China https://ror.org/00a2xv884 Ma Yifu Academy, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, 310058, Hangzhou, P. R. China su: Concord Theory of knowledge Philosophy Ethics Empirical research sug: subj: Concord Theory of knowledge Philosophy Ethics Empirical research keyword: Ben ti 本體 Unity of knowledge and action Wang Yangming 王陽明 ab: Lederman makes a distinction between the ben ti 本體 ("original natural condition") of knowledge and action and the gong fu 工夫 ("training") of knowledge and action, associating "unity" with ben ti and "joint advancement" with gong fu. This essay argues that both "unity" and "joint advancement" are used to describe the ben ti of knowledge and action, and Wang Yangming 王陽明 emphasizes the unity of the ben ti and gong fu of knowledge and action. Yangming's doctrine of the ben ti of knowledge and action is ultimately for practical potency and should not be reduced to a theoretical philosophy of the truth about knowledge and action. Yangming's philosophy is for genuine knowledge of genuine knowledge and action. If Yangming's philosophy is genuine, it must be characterized by the unity of knowledge and action. In other words, the appropriate methodology to read Yangming must be the unity of knowledge and action. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy is a copyright of Springer, 2024. All Rights Reserved. item: Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|