Ὁ Θεὸς ἔρως ἐστί: Origen and the Attribution of ἔρως to God.

Origen of Alexandria uses the language of ἔρως to explain God's desire to be with humanity. However, Plato's classic definition of ἔρως as a mix of poverty and plenty seems to be at odds with Origen's commitment to classical theism. This article explains why Origen does not consider this attribution...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of the Platonic Tradition Vol. 18; no. 2; pp. 121 - 152
Autor principal: Tolan, Daniel J.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Brill Academic Publishers 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=180651400&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 180651400
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        18725082
        2SGP
      jtl: International Journal of the Platonic Tradition
      issn: 18725082
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2024
      vid: 18
      iid: 2
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        180651400
        10.1163/18725473-bja10024
      ppf: 121
      ppct: 31
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 488KB
      tig:
        atl: Ὁ Θεὸς ἔρως ἐστί: Origen and the Attribution of ἔρως to God.
      aug:
        au: Tolan, Daniel J.
        affil: Clare Hall, University of Cambridge
      su:
        Theology
        Platonists
        Theism
      sug:
        subj:
          Theology
          Platonists
          Theism
      keyword:
        Agape
        Eros
        impassibility
        Origen
        Platonism
        Song of Songs
      ab: Origen of Alexandria uses the language of ἔρως to explain God's desire to be with humanity. However, Plato's classic definition of ἔρως as a mix of poverty and plenty seems to be at odds with Origen's commitment to classical theism. This article explains why Origen does not consider this attribution to contradict his theological commitments. It starts with a discussion of Origen's theory of divine attributes, the ἐπίνοιαι Χριστοῦ. Next, Origen's doctrine of passio caritatis , which states that God can actively will to be passive, is explained. Then, Origen's familiarity with Plato's Symposium is demonstrated. The article then considers Origen's attribution of ἔρως to God, and its context, in the Commentarium in Canticum Canticorum ; it emerges that the Incarnation is, for Origen, God's most erotic act. The final section shows that Origen maintains his understanding of God's erotic, incarnational movement towards fallen humanity in works other than the Commentarium in Canticum Canticorum.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of International Journal of the Platonic Tradition is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: International Journal of the Platonic Tradition
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N