Stakeholder involvement in setting priorities for implementation research on Health Care Planning.
Objective: To identify the problems faced in the context of Health Care Planning (HCP) from the perspective of stakeholders for setting priorities in the development of implementation research. Methods: Qualitative study based on workshops anchored in the nominal group technique. In mapping stakehol...
| Publicado en: | Acta Paulista de Enfermagem Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 1 - 13 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem
2023
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=180808943&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 180808943 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 01032100 YW2 jtl: Acta Paulista de Enfermagem issn: 01032100 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2023 vid: 36 iid: 1 pid: 84124 pub: Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem artinfo: ui: 180808943 10.37689/acta-ape/2023AOSPE019644 180808943 ppf: 1 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Stakeholder involvement in setting priorities for implementation research on Health Care Planning. aug: au: Almeida, Letícia Yamawaka de Belotti, Lorrayne Eshriqui, Ilana Sousa, Ana Alice Freire de Vesga-Varela, Andrea Liliana Nunes, Gelza Matos Bernardo, Debora Bonfim, Daiana affil: Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. sug: ab: Objective: To identify the problems faced in the context of Health Care Planning (HCP) from the perspective of stakeholders for setting priorities in the development of implementation research. Methods: Qualitative study based on workshops anchored in the nominal group technique. In mapping stakeholders, we sought to include a set of strategic actors that represented the diversity of action in the context of HCP. They were organized into three groups (A, B and C). Nine workshops structured in five stages were conducted. At the end, participants had the opportunity to reach a consensus on priority problems and identify the research questions. The data analysis process went through three phases, namely: content analysis, hierarchization of priority problems by stakeholder group and classification of research questions according to the objectives of theoretical approaches to implementation science (IS). Results: participation of 84 professionals distributed between groups A (n=13), B (n=14) and C (n=57). In total, 13 themes that addressed different challenges in the HCP scenario were identified. The themes "Understanding determinants and results of HCP implementation" (Group A), "Generating evidence on HCP" (Group B) and "Access to health care and services" (Group C) stood out in hierarchization process by the number of votes and order of importance, and were identified as priority. The questions raised by the groups, related to the priority themes, covered the different theoretical approaches to IS. Conclusion: Various themes and questions on implementation research were identified. Priority aspects were related to implementation and generation of evidence on HCP and access to health services. The priority setting exercise highlighted particular interests aligned with the needs perceived by stakeholders according to their involvement and performance in HCP. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|