Assessing the outcome of mobility assistive technology (OMAT) in daily living: results in an Italian sample.

Background: Despite the widely recognised benefits of assistive technology (AT) in everyday life, AT abandonment rate due to unmet user needs or expectations is high. World Health Organisation emphasised the importance of evaluating AT outcomes as a top research priority, but comprehensive approache...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology Vol. 19; no. 8; pp. 3031 - 3039
Autores principales: Ramella, Marina, Borgnis, Francesca, Salatino, Claudia, Saruggia, Maurizio, Folini, Chiara, Converti, Rosa Maria
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Nov2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=180828113&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 180828113
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        17483107
        1X04
      jtl: Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
      issn: 17483107
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2024
      vid: 19
      iid: 8
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        180828113
        177621604
        180828113
        180828113
        10.1080/17483107.2024.2339430
        180828113
      ppf: 3031
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Assessing the outcome of mobility assistive technology (OMAT) in daily living: results in an Italian sample.
      aug:
        au:
          Ramella, Marina
          Borgnis, Francesca
          Salatino, Claudia
          Saruggia, Maurizio
          Folini, Chiara
          Converti, Rosa Maria
        affil: IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy
      sug:
        subj:
          Activities of Daily Living Italy
          Assistive Technology Devices Utilization
          Physical Mobility
          Outcome Assessment
          Assistive Technology Services Evaluation
          Critical Path
          Persons with Disabilities
          Human
          Funding Source
          Italy
          Nonexperimental Studies
          Prospective Studies
          Pilot Studies
          Health Care Delivery Evaluation
          Health Services Accessibility Evaluation
          Rehabilitation Centers
          Motivation
          Quality of Life
          Patient Participation
          Personal Satisfaction
          Needs Assessment
          Patient Attitudes
          Patient Education
          Extended Family
          Severity of Illness Indices
          Questionnaires
          International Classification of Diseases
          Barthel Index
          Neuropsychological Tests
          Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36)
          Walkers
          Wheelchairs
          World Health Organization
          Italians
          Male
          Female
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Descriptive Statistics
          Comparative Studies
          Data Analysis Software
          T-Tests
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Despite the widely recognised benefits of assistive technology (AT) in everyday life, AT abandonment rate due to unmet user needs or expectations is high. World Health Organisation emphasised the importance of evaluating AT outcomes as a top research priority, but comprehensive approaches to assess users' needs and AT impact are still limited. Aim: The research study OMAT (outcomes of mobility assistive technology in rehabilitation pathways) aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a new AT assessment protocol for mobility AT, spanning from an initial evaluation of users' and relatives' needs to a follow-up after real-world use of assistive products (APs). Material and Methods: An observational single-arm study involving 95 AT users was conducted at Fondazione Don Gnocchi (Milan, Italy). The OMAT protocol encompassed baseline assessment, user training, prescription, authorisation, delivery and follow-up. The evaluations blend standard clinical evaluations with validated AT outcome measures for perceived effectiveness of AT, user satisfaction and changes in quality of life. Results: The feasibility of OMAT in clinical settings was established, with 67 user participants completing the protocol. Data showed positive impacts on user satisfaction and perceived AT effectiveness by all participants (users and relatives), with an improvement in the perceived degree of severity in problems. Quality of life outcomes, however, showed mixed results across various domains. Conclusion: OMAT is a feasible protocol for assessing mobility APs in clinical settings, underscoring the importance of involving users in the prescription process and the need for comprehensive AT monitoring mechanisms. This approach could enhance AT service delivery, exceeding the current standards of the Italian-National-Health-Service. Implication for rehabilitation: Personalise assistive technology (AT) based on user needs for higher effectiveness. Include structured follow-up in rehabilitation for better AT outcomes. Enhance patient involvement in AT selection to improve use. Focus on AT's role in enhancing overall quality of life. Use validated tools for AT impact assessment and monitoring.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N