How Much Like Us Do We Want AIs to Be?: Considering Both Intelligence and Psychology When Thinking about "Human-like" AI.

Replicating or exceeding human intelligence, not just in particular domains but in general, has always been a major goal of Artificial Intelligence (AI). We argue here that "human intelligence" is not only ill-defined, but often conflated with broader aspects of human psychology. Standard arguments...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Techné: Research in Philosophy & Technology Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 137 - 169
Main Authors: Dietrich, Eric, Fields, Chris, Sullins, John P., Van Heuveln, Bram, Zebrowski, Robin
Format: Article
Published: Philosophy Documentation Center 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
Description
Summary:Replicating or exceeding human intelligence, not just in particular domains but in general, has always been a major goal of Artificial Intelligence (AI). We argue here that "human intelligence" is not only ill-defined, but often conflated with broader aspects of human psychology. Standard arguments for replicating it are morally unacceptable. We then suggest a reframing: that the proper goal of AI is not to replicate humans, but to complement them by creating diverse intelligences capable of collaborating with humans. This goal renders issues of theory of mind, empathy, and caring, or community engagement, central to AI. It also challenges AI to better understand the circumstances in which human intelligence, including human moral intelligence, fails.