Negotiating pace, focus and identities: Patient/public involvement/engagement in a palliative care study.

Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is an increasingly important component of research conduct to enhance processes and potential for impact, yet is rarely critically interrogated. This paper draws on Foucauldian analysis to highlight the disciplinary powers and tensions arising in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Sociology of Health & Illness Vol. 46; no. 7; pp. 1327 - 1345
Autores principales: Forbat, Liz, Macgregor, Aisha, Brown, Talitha, McCormack, Brendan, Spilsbury, Karen, Rutherford, Alasdair, Hanratty, Barbara, Hockley, Jo, McKenzie, Maisie, Soulsby, Irene, Ogden, Margaret
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=180951323&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 180951323
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01419889
        7RA
      jtl: Sociology of Health & Illness
      issn: 01419889
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2024
      vid: 46
      iid: 7
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        180951323
        10.1111/1467-9566.13785
      ppf: 1327
      ppct: 18
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Negotiating pace, focus and identities: Patient/public involvement/engagement in a palliative care study.
      aug:
        au:
          Forbat, Liz
          Macgregor, Aisha
          Brown, Talitha
          McCormack, Brendan
          Spilsbury, Karen
          Rutherford, Alasdair
          Hanratty, Barbara
          Hockley, Jo
          McKenzie, Maisie
          Soulsby, Irene
          Ogden, Margaret
        affil:
          Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
          Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, London, UK
          Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sydney, Sydney New South Wales,, Australia
          School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
          Faculty of Medical Science, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
          College of Medicine and Veterinary Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
          PPI Lay Member, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
      su:
        Power (Social sciences)
        Self-evaluation
        Palliative treatment
        Qualitative research
        Negotiation
        Interviewing
        Patient participation
        Research funding
        Thematic analysis
      sug:
        subj:
          Power (Social sciences)
          Self-evaluation
          Palliative treatment
          Qualitative research
          Negotiation
          Interviewing
          Patient participation
          Research funding
          Thematic analysis
      keyword:
        co‐production
        negotiation
        palliative care
        patient/public involvement and engagement
        power
        co‐production
        negotiation
        palliative care
        patient/public involvement and engagement
        power
      ab: Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is an increasingly important component of research conduct to enhance processes and potential for impact, yet is rarely critically interrogated. This paper draws on Foucauldian analysis to highlight the disciplinary powers and tensions arising in PPIE. The paper draws on a nested evaluation interview study with three PPIE members and eight academics, who had been involved in an implementation science study focused on palliative care. PPIE members were involved in the whole study and are co‐authors of this article. Through shared values and commitments to the study, a team culture of equality was developed. Yet while power was dispersed and taken‐up by all team members, in so doing a self‐governance approach within the team was developed. The pace and focus of discussions was at times more subjugating than co‐production. Identities and positions were porous; the simplistic division of 'academic' and 'PPIE' did not stand up to scrutiny, with an increasing blurring of boundaries as people's experiences and insights changed over time. Continual, subtle, negotiations of roles, inputs and identities were manifest throughout the project. PPIE in research involves subtle, complex and ongoing disciplinary practices enacted by all members of the team.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N