Social Dynamics and the Evolution of Disciplines.

We consider the long-term evolution of science and show how a "contagion of disrespect"—an increasing dismissal of research in subfields associated with marginalized groups—can arise due to the dynamics of collaboration and reputation (versus, e.g., preconceived notions of the field's worth). This h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy of Science Vol. 91; no. 5; pp. 1179 - 1189
Autores principales: Wong, Kekoa, Rubin, Hannah
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Dec2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=180968279&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 180968279
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2024
      vid: 91
      iid: 5
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        180968279
        10.1017/psa.2023.149
      ppf: 1179
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.1MB
      tig:
        atl: Social Dynamics and the Evolution of Disciplines.
      aug:
        au:
          Wong, Kekoa
          Rubin, Hannah
        affil:
          University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
          University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
      su:
        Long-Term Evolution (Telecommunications)
        History of science
        Scientific method
        Reputation
      sug:
        subj:
          Long-Term Evolution (Telecommunications)
          History of science
          Scientific method
          Reputation
      ab: We consider the long-term evolution of science and show how a "contagion of disrespect"—an increasing dismissal of research in subfields associated with marginalized groups—can arise due to the dynamics of collaboration and reputation (versus, e.g., preconceived notions of the field's worth). This has implications both for how we understand the history of science and for how we attempt to promote diverse scientific inquiry.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N