The use of online methods to recruit and follow a hard‐to‐reach population in the Peer Alternatives for Addiction Study 2021 Cohort.

Background: Although studies are increasingly adopting online protocols, few such studies in the addiction field have comprehensively described their data review procedures and successes in detecting low‐quality/fraudulent data. The current study describes data collection protocols and outcomes of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Alcohol, Clinical & Experimental Research Vol. 48; no. 9; pp. 1795 - 1807
Autores principales: Zemore, Sarah E., Delk, Joanne, Mericle, Amy A., Martinez, Priscilla, Timko, Christine
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=180987100&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 180987100
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        29937175
        NACB
      jtl: Alcohol, Clinical & Experimental Research
      issn: 29937175
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2024
      vid: 48
      iid: 9
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        180987100
        180987100
        180987100
        10.1111/acer.15413
        180987100
      ppf: 1795
      ppct: 12
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The use of online methods to recruit and follow a hard‐to‐reach population in the Peer Alternatives for Addiction Study 2021 Cohort.
      aug:
        au:
          Zemore, Sarah E.
          Delk, Joanne
          Mericle, Amy A.
          Martinez, Priscilla
          Timko, Christine
        affil: Alcohol Research Group, Emeryville California,, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Alcoholism Therapy
          Peer Group
          Support Groups
          Prospective Studies
          Data Quality
          Data Collection Methods
          Research Subject Recruitment
          Online Systems
          Human
          Comparative Studies
          Research Subjects
          Surveys
          Convenience Sample
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Chi Square Test
          T-Tests
          Descriptive Statistics
          Male
          Female
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Race Factors
          Age Factors
          Sex Factors
          Ethnic Groups
          Marital Status
          Educational Status
          Economic Factors
          Employment Status
          Religion and Religions
          Odds Ratio
          Confidence Intervals
          Funding Source
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Although studies are increasingly adopting online protocols, few such studies in the addiction field have comprehensively described their data review procedures and successes in detecting low‐quality/fraudulent data. The current study describes data collection protocols and outcomes of a large, longitudinal study (the PAL Study 2021) that implemented online design elements to study individuals seeking peer support for an alcohol use disorder. Methods: In 2021, the PAL Study collaborated with mutual‐help group (MHG) partners and recovery‐related organizations to recruit individuals attending a 12‐step group, Women for Sobriety (WFS), LifeRing Secular Recovery, and/or SMART Recovery for an alcohol problem in‐person and/or online in the prior 30 days. Participation was solicited both online and in‐person. Individuals accessed baseline surveys via an open web link; follow‐ups occurred at 6 and 12 months. Analyses included calculating the proportion of surveys eliminated in data quality review; comparing MHG subsamples to internal survey (benchmark) data for Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), WFS, LifeRing, and SMART; and examining response rates and attrition. Results: Although 93% of respondents who opened the baseline survey completed it, 87% of baseline surveys were eliminated in data quality review (final N = 531). Nonetheless, cleaned MHG subsamples were generally similar to benchmark samples on gender, age, race/ethnicity, and education. Follow‐up rates for the cleaned sample were 88% (6 months) and 85% (12 months). Analyses revealed some differences in attrition by gender, primary MHG, and lifetime drug problems, but there was no evidence of greater attrition among those in earlier/less stable recovery. Conclusions: Study methods appear to have produced a valid, largely representative sample of the hard‐to‐reach target population that was successfully followed across 12 months. However, given the high survey elimination rate and need for extensive data review, we recommend that researchers avoid open‐link designs and include comprehensive data review when incorporating online design elements.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N