Mapping the Landscape of Continuing Professional Development: A Pilot Gap Map of Systematic Reviews.
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Gap maps graphically represent evidence from systematic reviews. We developed and tested a pilot gap map of systematic reviews examining the impact of continuing professional development (CPD). We conducted a mapping review and charted the conte...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions Vol. 44; no. 4; pp. 299 - 303 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Fall2024
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=180992272&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 180992272 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 08941912 9O0 jtl: Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions issn: 08941912 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Fall2024 vid: 44 iid: 4 pid: 433 pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins place: Baltimore, Maryland artinfo: ui: 180992272 180992272 180992272 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000558 180992272 ppf: 299 ppct: 4 formats: tig: atl: Mapping the Landscape of Continuing Professional Development: A Pilot Gap Map of Systematic Reviews. aug: au: Nexoe, Mette Andersen Andersen, Tue Helms Nilsson, Sigrid Mørkeberg Bjerre-Christensen, Ulla Lomborg, Kirsten Norgaard, Ole sug: subj: Chronic Disease Therapy Professional Development Education, Continuing Evidence Gaps Systematic Review Human Conceptual Framework Content Analysis Work Environment Online Education Learning Descriptive Statistics ab: Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Gap maps graphically represent evidence from systematic reviews. We developed and tested a pilot gap map of systematic reviews examining the impact of continuing professional development (CPD). We conducted a mapping review and charted the content of systematic reviews in a pilot gap map. Directive content analysis helped develop categories in three dimensions: evaluation framework, study characteristics, and number of systematic reviews. Of 389 identified records, 29 systematic reviews were included in the pilot map. We found gaps in evidence evaluating the impact of e-learning and skills training programs on various outcomes (patient, care, and work environment). Most evaluations corresponded to Kirkpatrick's learning model, with few considering other outcomes or how CPD could be mediated or influenced by contextual factors. Rooted in social epidemiological principles, the pilot map framework introduced new ways of understanding evidence from systematic reviews. Although the pilot map illuminated several evidence gaps and perspectives important to future CPD, a complete map is needed to validate the findings. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|