Intersession reliability of center of pressure measurement during bipedal standing with different count-back orders.
Dual-task assessments can identify changes in postural control during balance assessments. Static standing with backward counting is frequently used to evaluate postural control while dual-tasking. The most reliable countdown method for standing postural stability has not yet been defined. to invest...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies Vol. 40; pp. 828 - 835 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Churchill Livingstone, Inc.
Oct2024
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=181035846&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 181035846 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 13608592 8II jtl: Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies issn: 13608592 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2024 vid: 40 pid: 1242 pub: Churchill Livingstone, Inc. artinfo: ui: 181035846 181035846 181035846 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.026 181035846 ppf: 828 ppct: 7 formats: tig: atl: Intersession reliability of center of pressure measurement during bipedal standing with different count-back orders. aug: au: Saberi, Shirin Mosharaf, Mahshid Yeowell, Gillian Sadeghi-Demneh, Ebrahim affil: Musculoskeletal Research Center, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran sug: subj: Balance, Postural Standing Intrarater Reliability Interrater Reliability Task Performance and Analysis Cognition Human Male Female Adult Descriptive Statistics Analysis of Variance Intraclass Correlation Coefficient Reproducibility of Results Attention Adult: 19-44 years Male Female ab: Dual-task assessments can identify changes in postural control during balance assessments. Static standing with backward counting is frequently used to evaluate postural control while dual-tasking. The most reliable countdown method for standing postural stability has not yet been defined. to investigate postural stability's intra- and inter-day reliability while backward counting in different steps. Thirty-nine healthy adults (20 females, 26.94 ± 7.55 years) completed 70 s trials of stability tests with no dual-task, counting backward under five conditions (in ones, tows, threes, fours, and fives) while standing on a force-plate in three sessions: two sessions were on the same day, and the third session was one-week apart. The repeatability of measurements was tested using repeated-measure analysis of variance, interclass correlation, and standard error of measurements. The interclass correlation scores ranged from 0.67 to 0.92, and the standard error of measurements ranged from 2.9% to 13.4%. No significant systematic changes (p < 0.05) occurred between the testing sessions for any backward counting. The backward counting showed higher reliability when performed in condition 5 (counting backward in five's). The inter-day reliability scores were greater than intera-day reliability. Dual-tasking with most backward counting (in ones to fives) is reliable, and a quantitative assessment of the center of pressure could be used to monitor the changes in postural stability between sessions. • Reliability of postural stability varies based on counting backward orders. • Counting backward in five's showed higher reliability values than other orders. • The inter-day reliability values are greater than intra-day reliability. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|