The "Unthought Mixt Subject" and Destroying Reality: Reply to Brewster and Corpt.
In responding to the moving discussions by Mary Kim Brewster and Elizabeth Corpt, the author considers the "unthought mixt subject" and for whom it is a danger. Brewster's notion of the "unthought mixt subject" emphasizes how mixed-race subjectivity is often overlooked within the dynamics of the int...
| Publicado en: | Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 34; no. 6; pp. 747 - 755 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Nov/Dec2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=181055343&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 181055343 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10481885 FME jtl: Psychoanalytic Dialogues issn: 10481885 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov/Dec2024 vid: 34 iid: 6 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 181055343 10.1080/10481885.2024.2417609 ppf: 747 ppct: 8 formats: tig: atl: The "Unthought Mixt Subject" and Destroying Reality: Reply to Brewster and Corpt. aug: au: Rodríguez, Adam J. affil: Private Practice, Portland, Oregon, USA su: Psychoanalysis Anxiety Critical thinking Dilemma Subjectivity sug: subj: Psychoanalysis Anxiety Critical thinking Dilemma Subjectivity ab: In responding to the moving discussions by Mary Kim Brewster and Elizabeth Corpt, the author considers the "unthought mixt subject" and for whom it is a danger. Brewster's notion of the "unthought mixt subject" emphasizes how mixed-race subjectivity is often overlooked within the dynamics of the interracial primal scene and in the broader context of society, including psychoanalysis. Corpt raises questions about how the psychic dilemmas of mixing, with their associated tensions and anxieties, may contribute to how analytic training makes itself untenable. The author further examines how, beyond the culture of psychoanalytic institutes, the practical aspects of training perpetuate this exclusivity. The discussion highlights how the inclination toward sameness, akin to the avoidance of difference, stifles critical thinking and provides only an illusion of comfort. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|