A task-dependent analysis of closed vs. open and fine vs. gross motor skills in handedness.
The traditional classifications of motor skills nature (open vs closed; fine vs gross) have not been considered in handedness investigations. Instead, previous research focused on comparing complex vs less complex motor behaviour, leaving a gap in the literature. We compared manual preference betwee...
| Publicado en: | Laterality Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 380 - 396 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jul2024
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=181135176&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 181135176 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 1357650X BAE jtl: Laterality issn: 1357650X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul2024 vid: 29 iid: 4 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 181135176 179057018 181135176 181135176 10.1080/1357650X.2024.2391793 181135176 ppf: 380 ppct: 16 formats: tig: atl: A task-dependent analysis of closed vs. open and fine vs. gross motor skills in handedness. aug: au: Marcori, Alexandre J. Gamberini, Matheus G. Ocklenburg, Sebastian Monteiro, Pedro H. M. Okazaki, Victor H. A. affil: Physical Education Department, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Brazil sug: subj: Motor Skills Evaluation Dominance, Cerebral Evaluation Task Performance and Analysis Human Male Female Adolescence Adult Middle Age Left-Handedness Evaluation Right-Handedness Evaluation Scales Convenience Sample Descriptive Statistics Data Analysis Software Psychomotor Performance Analysis of Variance Chi Square Test Post Hoc Analysis Adolescent: 13-18 years Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Male Female ab: The traditional classifications of motor skills nature (open vs closed; fine vs gross) have not been considered in handedness investigations. Instead, previous research focused on comparing complex vs less complex motor behaviour, leaving a gap in the literature. We compared manual preference between different motor skill characteristics, namely: fine and closed (FC), gross and closed (GC) and gross and open (GO) tasks. The hand preference was assessed with the Global Lateral Preference Inventory in four hundred and forty participants (244 women) aged from 18 to 59 years old. By assessing the degree and direction of handedness in different motor skills, our results showed a stronger lateralization pattern for FC motor skills as compared to GC and GO, with GO also being less lateralized than GC. Our results expand those of previous investigations that used the motor skill complexity definitions by showing how handedness can also be modulated by the interaction between classic motor skills classifications. Future research should consider fine vs. gross and open vs. closed classifications when selecting tasks for analysis of asymmetries of preference. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|