What motivates humeanism?

The 'great divide' in the metaphysics of science is between Humean approaches—which reduce scientific laws (and related modalities) to patterns of occurrent facts—and anti-Humean approaches—where laws stand apart from the patterns of events, making those events hold. There is a vast literature on th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Studies Vol. 181; no. 11; pp. 2935 - 2954
Autor principal: Bhogal, Harjit
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Nov2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=181200813&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 181200813
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318116
        4L8
      jtl: Philosophical Studies
      issn: 00318116
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2024
      vid: 181
      iid: 11
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        181200813
        10.1007/s11098-024-02238-z
      ppf: 2935
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 650KB
      tig:
        atl: What motivates humeanism?
      aug:
        au: Bhogal, Harjit
        affil: https://ror.org/047s2c258 Institution University of Maryland, Skinner Building, 4300 Chapel Lane, 20742, College Park, MD, USA
      su:
        Metaphysics
        Humanism
        Motivation (Psychology)
        Empiricism
        Pragmatism
      sug:
        subj:
          Metaphysics
          Humanism
          Motivation (Psychology)
          Empiricism
          Pragmatism
      keyword:
        Explanation
        Humeanism
        Laws of Nature
        Unification
      ab: The 'great divide' in the metaphysics of science is between Humean approaches—which reduce scientific laws (and related modalities) to patterns of occurrent facts—and anti-Humean approaches—where laws stand apart from the patterns of events, making those events hold. There is a vast literature on this debate, with many problems raised for the Humean. But a major problem comes right at the start—what's the motivation for Humeanism in the first place? This is rather unclear. In fact Maudlin, and other anti-Humeans, claim that there is no good motivation for Humeanism. I criticize a few influential approaches to motivating Humeanism—in particular those based on empiricism, pragmatism, and fidelity to science. In their place I suggest a different type of motivation, which has not received much attention in the literature, that rests on considerations of the role of unification in scientific understanding.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2024. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophical Studies
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N