A Novel Machine Learning Model to Predict Revision ACL Reconstruction Failure in the MARS Cohort.

Background: As machine learning becomes increasingly utilized in orthopaedic clinical research, the application of machine learning methodology to cohort data from the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) presents a valuable opportunity to translate data into patient-specific insights. Purpose: To...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Vol. 12; no. 11; pp. 1 - 15
Autores principales: Vasavada, Kinjal, Vasavada, Vrinda, Moran, Jay, Devana, Sai, Lee, Changhee, Hame, Sharon L., Jazrawi, Laith M., Sherman, Orrin H., Huston, Laura J., Haas, Amanda K., Allen, Christina R., Cooper, Daniel E., DeBerardino, Thomas M., Spindler, Kurt P., Stuart, Michael J., Amendola, Annunziato, Annunziata, Christopher C., Arciero, Robert A., Bach Jr, Bernard R., Baker III, Champ L.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. Nov2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=181276594&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 181276594
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        23259671
        FUGT
      jtl: Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
      issn: 23259671
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2024
      vid: 12
      iid: 11
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        181276594
        181276594
        181276594
        10.1177/23259671241291920
        181276594
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 14
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: A Novel Machine Learning Model to Predict Revision ACL Reconstruction Failure in the MARS Cohort.
      aug:
        au:
          Vasavada, Kinjal
          Vasavada, Vrinda
          Moran, Jay
          Devana, Sai
          Lee, Changhee
          Hame, Sharon L.
          Jazrawi, Laith M.
          Sherman, Orrin H.
          Huston, Laura J.
          Haas, Amanda K.
          Allen, Christina R.
          Cooper, Daniel E.
          DeBerardino, Thomas M.
          Spindler, Kurt P.
          Stuart, Michael J.
          Amendola, Annunziato
          Annunziata, Christopher C.
          Arciero, Robert A.
          Bach Jr, Bernard R.
          Baker III, Champ L.
        affil: Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Machine Learning
          Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
          Reoperation
          Treatment Failure
          Human
          Prediction Models
          Prospective Studies
          Patient-Reported Outcomes
          Logistic Regression
          ROC Curve
          Allografts
          Sports Participation
          Scales
          Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36)
          Patient Selection
      ab: Background: As machine learning becomes increasingly utilized in orthopaedic clinical research, the application of machine learning methodology to cohort data from the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) presents a valuable opportunity to translate data into patient-specific insights. Purpose: To apply novel machine learning methodology to MARS cohort data to determine a predictive model of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (rACLR) graft failure and features most predictive of failure. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors prospectively recruited patients undergoing rACLR from the MARS cohort and obtained preoperative radiographs, surgeon-reported intraoperative findings, and 2- and 6-year follow-up data on patient-reported outcomes, additional surgeries, and graft failure. Machine learning models including logistic regression (LR), XGBoost, gradient boosting (GB), random forest (RF), and a validated ensemble algorithm (AutoPrognosis) were built to predict graft failure by 6 years postoperatively. Validated performance metrics and feature importance measures were used to evaluate model performance. Results: The cohort included 960 patients who completed 6-year follow-up, with 5.7% (n = 55) experiencing graft failure. AutoPrognosis demonstrated the highest discriminative power (model area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: AutoPrognosis, 0.703; RF, 0.618; GB, 0.660; XGBoost, 0.680; LR, 0.592), with well-calibrated scores (model Brier score: AutoPrognosis, 0.053; RF, 0.054; GB, 0.057; XGBoost, 0.058; LR, 0.111). The most important features for AutoPrognosis model performance were prior compromised femoral and tibial tunnels (placement and size) and allograft graft type used in current rACLR. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated the ability of the novel AutoPrognosis machine learning model to best predict the risk of graft failure in patients undergoing rACLR at 6 years postoperatively with moderate predictive ability. Femoral and tibial tunnel size and position in prior ACLR and allograft use in current rACLR were all risk factors for rACLR failure in the context of the AutoPrognosis model. This study describes a unique model that can be externally validated with larger data sets and contribute toward the creation of a robust rACLR bedside risk calculator in future studies. Registration: NCT00625885 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N