Patient-Determined Important Change for the Neck Disability Index With Application of Credibility Analysis: An Exploratory Study.

The purposes of this study were to preliminarily report patient-identified change for the neck disability index (NDI) as either important or not important with time between follow-up of approximately 7 to 10 days and assess the credibility of the preliminary results with the use of a recently establ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics Vol. 47; no. 1-4; pp. 77 - 85
Autores principales: Young, Brian A., Boland, David M., Koppenhaver, Shane L., Puentedura, Emilio J., Cleland, Joshua A.
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Jan2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=181489376&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 181489376
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01614754
        8GE
      jtl: Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
      issn: 01614754
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2024
      vid: 47
      iid: 1-4
      pid: 1265
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        181489376
        181489376
        181489376
        10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.08.016
        181489376
      ppf: 77
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Patient-Determined Important Change for the Neck Disability Index With Application of Credibility Analysis: An Exploratory Study.
      aug:
        au:
          Young, Brian A.
          Boland, David M.
          Koppenhaver, Shane L.
          Puentedura, Emilio J.
          Cleland, Joshua A.
        affil: Department of Physical Therapy, Baylor University, Waco, Texas
      sug:
        subj:
          Neck Pain Diagnosis
          Neck Pain Therapy
          Disability Evaluation Methods
          After Care
          Patient-Reported Outcomes Evaluation
          Questionnaires
          Instrument Validation
          Credibility (Research)
          Human
          Exploratory Research
          Validation Studies
          Secondary Analysis
          Treatment Duration
          Physical Therapy Evaluation
          Pain Management
          Manipulation, Chiropractic Methods
          Thoracic Vertebrae Physiopathology
          Dry Needling Methods
          ROC Curve
          Measurement Error Evaluation
          Confidence Intervals
          Descriptive Statistics
          Pain Threshold Evaluation
          Patient Centered Care
          Pain Measurement
      ab: The purposes of this study were to preliminarily report patient-identified change for the neck disability index (NDI) as either important or not important with time between follow-up of approximately 7 to 10 days and assess the credibility of the preliminary results with the use of a recently established credibility instrument. This study was a secondary analysis from a primary randomized clinical trial assessing short-term physical therapist care for individuals with mechanical neck pain. Neck disability index scores and participant-reported importance of global rating of change scores from 42 participants were analyzed from a randomized clinical trial assessing short-term responses to thoracic manipulation and dry needling for neck pain. Patient-important change was computed using receiver operating characteristic curves, and statistical error of the measurement was calculated using (SD × [1 − r]1/2) × 1.96 to assess measurement error at the 95% CI. Thirty-six participants rated global rating of change as important, and 6 rated it as not important. Patient-important change was calculated at 3.5 NDI points on a 0 to 50 NDI scoring scale. This value exceeded the statistical error, which was calculated at 2.16 NDI points. The credibility analysis revealed that 4 of 5 criteria showed strong credibility for the patient-important change estimate. Using patient-determined importance to dichotomize improvement may yield a lower threshold than current researcher-defined methods. Clinically, these results may be more responsive to patient-centric change than using previously reported minimal clinically important difference data.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N