Super-resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction Cervical Spine 1.5T MRI: Improved Interobserver Agreement in Evaluations of Neuroforaminal Stenosis Compared to Conventional Deep Learning Reconstruction.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) is superior to conventional deep learning reconstruction (DLR) with respect to interobserver agreement in the evaluation of neuroforaminal stenosis using 1.5T cervical spine MRI. This retrospectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Digital Imaging Vol. 37; no. 5; pp. 2466 - 2474
Autores principales: Yasaka, Koichiro, Uehara, Shunichi, Kato, Shimpei, Watanabe, Yusuke, Tajima, Taku, Akai, Hiroyuki, Yoshioka, Naoki, Akahane, Masaaki, Ohtomo, Kuni, Abe, Osamu, Kiryu, Shigeru
Formato: diagnostic images equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Oct2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=181515415&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 181515415
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08971889
        DOQ
      jtl: Journal of Digital Imaging
      issn: 08971889
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2024
      vid: 37
      iid: 5
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        181515415
        181515415
        181515415
        10.1007/s10278-024-01112-y
        181515415
      ppf: 2466
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Super-resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction Cervical Spine 1.5T MRI: Improved Interobserver Agreement in Evaluations of Neuroforaminal Stenosis Compared to Conventional Deep Learning Reconstruction.
      aug:
        au:
          Yasaka, Koichiro
          Uehara, Shunichi
          Kato, Shimpei
          Watanabe, Yusuke
          Tajima, Taku
          Akai, Hiroyuki
          Yoshioka, Naoki
          Akahane, Masaaki
          Ohtomo, Kuni
          Abe, Osamu
          Kiryu, Shigeru
        affil: https://ror.org/057zh3y96 Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8655, Tokyo, Japan
      sug:
        subj:
          Spinal Stenosis Diagnosis
          Cervical Vertebrae Pathology
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging
          Image Processing, Computer Assisted Methods
          Interrater Reliability Evaluation
          Deep Learning
          Human
          Retrospective Design
          Record Review
          Radiologists
          Spinal Cord
          Artificial Intelligence
          Neurodegenerative Diseases
      ab: The aim of this study was to investigate whether super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) is superior to conventional deep learning reconstruction (DLR) with respect to interobserver agreement in the evaluation of neuroforaminal stenosis using 1.5T cervical spine MRI. This retrospective study included 39 patients who underwent 1.5T cervical spine MRI. T2-weighted sagittal images were reconstructed with SR-DLR and DLR. Three blinded radiologists independently evaluated the images in terms of the degree of neuroforaminal stenosis, depictions of the vertebrae, spinal cord and neural foramina, sharpness, noise, artefacts and diagnostic acceptability. In quantitative image analyses, a fourth radiologist evaluated the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by placing a circular or ovoid region of interest on the spinal cord, and the edge slope based on a linear region of interest placed across the surface of the spinal cord. Interobserver agreement in the evaluations of neuroforaminal stenosis using SR-DLR and DLR was 0.422–0.571 and 0.410–0.542, respectively. The kappa values between reader 1 vs. reader 2 and reader 2 vs. reader 3 significantly differed. Two of the three readers rated depictions of the spinal cord, sharpness, and diagnostic acceptability as significantly better with SR-DLR than with DLR. Both SNR and edge slope (/mm) were also significantly better with SR-DLR (12.9 and 6031, respectively) than with DLR (11.5 and 3741, respectively) (p < 0.001 for both). In conclusion, compared to DLR, SR-DLR improved interobserver agreement in the evaluations of neuroforaminal stenosis using 1.5T cervical spine MRI.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        equations & formulas
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N