Governing failed neoliberal subjects: Representations of women's mental health in Australian mental health policies.
This paper uses Carol Bacchi's 'What's the problem represented to be?' (WPR) framework to explore representations of women's mental health in federal and South Australian mental health policies. It argues that mental health policies govern women through neoliberal discourses that individualise menta...
| Publicado en: | Qualitative Social Work Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 61 - 78 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
Jan2025
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | This paper uses Carol Bacchi's 'What's the problem represented to be?' (WPR) framework to explore representations of women's mental health in federal and South Australian mental health policies. It argues that mental health policies govern women through neoliberal discourses that individualise mental health and illness while neglecting the social structural factors which significantly influence mental health outcomes and health equity. In a 'self-monitoring' neoliberal society, people are increasingly required to seek medical and pharmaceutical intervention to promote ideal personhoods, with women overrepresented in this group. The disciplinary power of the medicalisation discourse categorises women as either ideal or failed neoliberal subjects. This is concerning for social workers because neoliberal and medicalisation discourses shape how women's mental health is represented in policy and responded to in practice. This paper challenges biomedical and neoliberal discourses underpinning policy representations and identifies the implications for social work and social policy. |
|---|