IN DEFENSE OF CLAIM RIGHTS.
The article "IN DEFENSE OF CLAIM RIGHTS" by Michael Da Silva discusses the concept of claim rights and their correlative duties. It defends the claim right model against criticisms that it is inadequate or unable to serve a distinct normative purpose. The article argues that claim rights can fulfill...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy Vol. 29; no. 1; pp. 140 - 151 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy
Nov2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=181533882&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 181533882 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 15593061 8WVW jtl: Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy issn: 15593061 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2024 vid: 29 iid: 1 pid: 53692 pub: Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy artinfo: ui: 181533882 10.26556/jesp.v29i1.3590 ppf: 140 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 801KB tig: atl: IN DEFENSE OF CLAIM RIGHTS. aug: au: Da Silva, Michael affil: University of Southampton su: Right to health Universal healthcare Group rights Human rights Legal rights Duty sug: subj: Right to health Universal healthcare Group rights Human rights Legal rights Duty ab: The article "IN DEFENSE OF CLAIM RIGHTS" by Michael Da Silva discusses the concept of claim rights and their correlative duties. It defends the claim right model against criticisms that it is inadequate or unable to serve a distinct normative purpose. The article argues that claim rights can fulfill their intended taxonomic function while meeting explanatory and extensional desiderata. It also addresses challenges related to positive social rights and the distinction between rights and goods. The defense of claim rights focuses on their distinct moral standing and the relational nature of rights claims. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy is the property of Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy holder: Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|