Pathology requesting in a regional Australian Emergency Department; an observational study comparing current practice with college guidelines.

Introduction: In 2018, the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA) produced a guideline to encourage appropriate pathology requesting in the Emergency Department (ED). Objective: To assess adherence to the ACEM/RCPA pathology tes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Australian Journal of Rural Health Vol. 32; no. 5; pp. 1062 - 1068
Autores principales: Oakman, Georgina, Anderson, Alastair, Oosthuizen, Johann De Witt, Olaussen, Alexander
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Oct2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=181569542&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 181569542
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10385282
        FQO
      jtl: Australian Journal of Rural Health
      issn: 10385282
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2024
      vid: 32
      iid: 5
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        181569542
        177813622
        181569542
        181569542
        10.1111/ajr.13151
        181569542
      ppf: 1062
      ppct: 6
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Pathology requesting in a regional Australian Emergency Department; an observational study comparing current practice with college guidelines.
      aug:
        au:
          Oakman, Georgina
          Anderson, Alastair
          Oosthuizen, Johann De Witt
          Olaussen, Alexander
        affil: Critical Care SRMO, Northeast Health Wangaratta, Wangaratta Victoria,, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Emergency Service Standards
          Pathologists Standards
          Guideline Adherence
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Child
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Australia
          Retrospective Design
          Nonexperimental Studies
          Hematologic Tests Evaluation
          Practice Guidelines
          Practice Patterns
          C-Reactive Protein Blood
          Abdominal Pain Etiology
          Outcome Assessment
          Molecular Diagnostic Techniques Methods
          Hospitals
          Pathology, Clinical Methods
          Proficiency Testing, Laboratory
          Clinical Information Systems
          Blood Gas Analysis
          Descriptive Statistics
          Comparative Studies
          Chi Square Test
          Odds Ratio
          Confidence Intervals
          Child: 6-12 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Introduction: In 2018, the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA) produced a guideline to encourage appropriate pathology requesting in the Emergency Department (ED). Objective: To assess adherence to the ACEM/RCPA pathology testing guideline in a regional ED. Methods, Design, Setting and Participants: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at a regional Australian ED over 7 days. Adults with a presenting complaint encompassed by the guideline were included. All blood tests were audited against the guideline recommendations and classified as indicated or non‐indicated. Chi‐squared analyses were performed to explore the association between presenting complaint and non‐indicated testing. Main Outcome Measure: The primary outcome was the number of non‐indicated blood tests. Results: Forty percent of tests ordered were not clinically indicated, with non‐indicated testing occurring during 87% of encounters. The C‐reactive protein (CRP) was the test most frequently ordered outside of guidelines (94% non‐indicated). Patients presenting with lower abdominal pain accounted for nearly one‐quarter of all non‐indicated tests. Conclusions: Blood tests were commonly requested outside of the guideline recommendations and interventions to improve pathology stewardship are required.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N