Genealogies and Critiques of Resilience.

The article presents an essay which traces the evolution of resilience from material sciences to ecology and social sciences. It explores its application in ecological systems and human development, particularly in psychology and social work. It critiques the concept, highlighting concerns about its...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Historical Review Vol. 129; no. 4; pp. 1396 - 1401
Autores principales: Di-Capua, Yoav, Warren, Wendy
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Dec2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=181680513&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 181680513
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00028762
        AHS
      jtl: American Historical Review
      issn: 00028762
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2024
      vid: 129
      iid: 4
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        181680513
        10.1093/ahr/rhae473
      ppf: 1396
      ppct: 5
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 156KB
      tig:
        atl: Genealogies and Critiques of Resilience.
      aug:
        au:
          Di-Capua, Yoav
          Warren, Wendy
      su:
        Resilient design
        Ecological resilience
        Psychological resilience
        Materials science
        Responsibility
      sug:
        subj:
          Resilient design
          Ecological resilience
          Psychological resilience
          Materials science
          Responsibility
      ab: The article presents an essay which traces the evolution of resilience from material sciences to ecology and social sciences. It explores its application in ecological systems and human development, particularly in psychology and social work. It critiques the concept, highlighting concerns about its focus on individual responsibility and emphasizing the need to consider social, historical, and structural factors in understanding resilience.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: © 2019 The American Historical Association.
      item: American Historical Review
      holder: Oxford University Press / USA
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N