Propertius 2.1.71-78 and the Latin epitaphs.

The article examines the Latin poem by Propertius, lines 2.1.71-78, to illustrate the relationship between the elegy and the Latin epitaphs in fashion. It addresses the relationship in form and in meaning of lines 71-72 to the literary convention of the epitaphs, comments on imitation by lines 75-76...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Mnemosyne Vol. 52; no. 2; pp. 194 - 198
Autor principal: Herrera, Gregorio Rodriguez
Formato: Poetry Review
Publicado: Brill Academic Publishers Apr99
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=1817021&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 1817021
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00267074
        MNM
      jtl: Mnemosyne
      issn: 00267074
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr99
      vid: 52
      iid: 2
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        1817021
        10.1163/1568525991528815
      ppf: 194
      ppct: 4
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 141KB
      tig:
        atl: Propertius 2.1.71-78 and the Latin epitaphs.
      aug:
        au: Herrera, Gregorio Rodriguez
      su:
        Convention (Philosophy) in literature
        Latin elegiac poetry
        Epitaphs in literature
        Propertius, Sextus, ca. 50 B.C.-15 B.C.
        Latin poetry
        Literary criticism
      sug:
        subj:
          Convention (Philosophy) in literature
          Latin elegiac poetry
          Epitaphs in literature
          Propertius, Sextus, ca. 50 B.C.-15 B.C.
          Latin poetry
          Literary criticism
      ab: The article examines the Latin poem by Propertius, lines 2.1.71-78, to illustrate the relationship between the elegy and the Latin epitaphs in fashion. It addresses the relationship in form and in meaning of lines 71-72 to the literary convention of the epitaphs, comments on imitation by lines 75-76 of the commonplace of the invitation to the passer-by, and explores typical and literary convention of the epitaphs.
      pubtype: Review
      doctype: Poetry Review
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Mnemosyne is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Mnemosyne
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1999
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N