The matter with subjects of justice.
Although the non-human turn in justice theory remains in its infancy, several projects have emerged, including Earth system justice, multispecies justice, and planetary justice. Crucially, candidate theories must provide convincing responses to the who, what, and how of justice. The question of who...
| Publicado en: | Environmental Politics Vol. 34; no. 1; pp. 188 - 192 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jan2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=181909599&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 181909599 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 09644016 EIP jtl: Environmental Politics issn: 09644016 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2025 vid: 34 iid: 1 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 181909599 10.1080/09644016.2024.2334611 ppf: 188 ppct: 4 formats: tig: atl: The matter with subjects of justice. aug: au: Gellers, Joshua C. affil: Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA su: Justice Philosophers Justice administration Scholars Winter sug: subj: Justice Philosophers Justice administration Scholars Winter keyword: anthropocene matter Multispecies justice non-human planetary justice anthropocene matter Multispecies justice non-human planetary justice ab: Although the non-human turn in justice theory remains in its infancy, several projects have emerged, including Earth system justice, multispecies justice, and planetary justice. Crucially, candidate theories must provide convincing responses to the who, what, and how of justice. The question of who can prove particularly challenging, as philosophers continue to debate the moral relevance of properties of entities or the relations between them. Scholars of environmental politics seeking to develop more-than-human justice theories must carefully attend to issues inherent in this debate, including conceptual inconsistencies. Recent work by Winter and Schlosberg advancing a materialist perspective on multispecies and planetary justice demonstrates the difficult task of participating in this conversation, as evidenced by their application of the term 'subjects of justice.' In this brief essay, I identify three flaws in their use of this phrase and explain why the treatment of subjects matters to justice theory in the Anthropocene. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|